mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Potential Field as Scene Affordance for Behavior Change-Based Visual Risk Object Identification

arXiv 2409.15846 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study behavior change-based visual risk object identification (Visual-ROI), a critical framework designed to detect potential hazards for intelligent driving systems. Existing methods often show significant limitations in spatial accuracy and temporal consistency, stemming from an incomplete understanding of scene affordance. For example, these methods frequently misidentify vehicles that do not impact the ego vehicle as risk objects. Furthermore, existing behavior change-based methods are inefficient because they implement causal inference in the perspective image space. We propose a new framework with a Bird's Eye View (BEV) representation to overcome the above challenges. Specifically, we utilize potential fields as scene affordance, involving repulsive forces derived from road infrastructure and traffic participants, along with attractive forces sourced from target destinations. In this work, we compute potential fields by assigning different energy levels according to the semantic labels obtained from BEV semantic segmentation. We conduct thorough experiments and ablation studies, comparing the proposed method with various state-of-the-art algorithms on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Our results show a notable increase in spatial and temporal consistency, with enhancements of 20.3% and 11.6% on the RiskBench dataset, respectively. Additionally, we can improve computational efficiency by 88%. We achieve improvements of 5.4% in spatial accuracy and 7.2% in temporal consistency on the nuScenes dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

Builds on

42 of 77 references.

References · 42

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  3. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  4. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
  5. 2016MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Trackingcited by 531
  6. 2022ST-P3: End-to-end Vision-based Autonomous Driving via Spatial-Temporal Feature Learningcited by 365
  7. 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Plannercited by 240
  8. 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 229
  9. 2021MP3: A Unified Model to Map, Perceive, Predict and Plancited by 211
  10. 2017Detecting and Recognizing Human-Object Interactionscited by 199
  11. 2021NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 174
  12. 2020Reconstructing Hand-Object Interactions in the Wildcited by 143
30 more
  1. 2022DRAMA: Joint Risk Localization and Captioning in Drivingcited by 125
  2. 2022KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradientscited by 95
  3. 2018TraPHic: Trajectory Prediction in Dense and Heterogeneous Traffic Using Weighted Interactionscited by 82
  4. 2017Learning to Act Properly: Predicting and Explaining Affordances from Imagescited by 74
  5. 2019Putting Humans in a Scene: Learning Affordance in 3D Indoor Environmentscited by 72
  6. 2019Grounding Human-to-Vehicle Advice for Self-driving Vehiclescited by 71
  7. 2023Rank2Tell: A Multimodal Driving Dataset for Joint Importance Ranking and Reasoningcited by 63
  8. 2022Occupancy Flow Fields for Motion Forecasting in Autonomous Drivingcited by 62
  9. 2017Predicting Driver Attention in Critical Situationscited by 61
  10. 2020TITAN: Future Forecast using Action Priorscited by 58
  11. 2023Putting People in Their Place: Affordance-Aware Human Insertion into Scenescited by 53
  12. 2018Anticipating Traffic Accidents with Adaptive Loss and Large-scale Incident DBcited by 51
  13. 2018Binge Watching: Scaling Affordance Learning from Sitcomscited by 41
  14. 2020Who Make Drivers Stop? Towards Driver-centric Risk Assessment: Risk Object Identification via Causal Inferencecited by 34
  15. 2017Agent-Centric Risk Assessment: Accident Anticipation and Risky Region Localizationcited by 33
  16. 2019Looking at the right stuff: Guided semantic-gaze for autonomous drivingcited by 32
  17. 2019MEDIRL: Predicting the Visual Attention of Drivers via Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  18. 2019Learning 3D-aware Egocentric Spatial-Temporal Interaction via Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 22
  19. 2019Periphery-Fovea Multi-Resolution Driving Model guided by Human Attentioncited by 19
  20. 2019Goal-oriented Object Importance Estimation in On-road Driving Videoscited by 19
  21. 2020Interaction Graphs for Object Importance Estimation in On-road Driving Videoscited by 15
  22. 2021Hallucinating Pose-Compatible Scenescited by 14
  23. 2022Important Object Identification with Semi-Supervised Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 13
  24. 2023RiskBench: A Scenario-based Benchmark for Risk Identificationcited by 12
  25. 2015In Defense of the Direct Perception of Affordancescited by 9
  26. 2021DROID: Driver-centric Risk Object Identificationcited by 9
  27. 2019Potential Field: Interpretable and Unified Representation for Trajectory Predictioncited by 4
  28. 2023Learning Road Scene-level Representations via Semantic Region Predictioncited by 4
  29. 2023Object Importance Estimation using Counterfactual Reasoning for Intelligent Drivingcited by 3
  30. 2023Potential Field-based Path Planning with Interactive Speed Optimization for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.