mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visual Localization in 3D Maps: Comparing Point Cloud, Mesh, and NeRF Representations

arXiv 2408.11966 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.ROcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in mapping techniques have enabled the creation of highly accurate dense 3D maps during robotic missions, such as point clouds, meshes, or NeRF-based representations. These developments present new opportunities for reusing these maps for localization. However, there remains a lack of a unified approach that can operate seamlessly across different map representations. This paper presents and evaluates a global visual localization system capable of localizing a single camera image across various 3D map representations built using both visual and lidar sensing. Our system generates a database by synthesizing novel views of the scene, creating RGB and depth image pairs. Leveraging the precise 3D geometric map, our method automatically defines rendering poses, reducing the number of database images while preserving retrieval performance. To bridge the domain gap between real query camera images and synthetic database images, our approach utilizes learning-based descriptors and feature detectors. We evaluate the system's performance through extensive real-world experiments conducted in both indoor and outdoor settings, assessing the effectiveness of each map representation and demonstrating its advantages over traditional structure-from-motion (SfM) localization approaches. The results show that all three map representations can achieve consistent localization success rates of 55% and higher across various environments. NeRF synthesized images show superior performance, localizing query images at an average success rate of 72%. Furthermore, we demonstrate an advantage over SfM-based approaches that our synthesized database enables localization in the reverse travel direction which is unseen during the mapping process. Our system, operating in real-time on a mobile laptop equipped with a GPU, achieves a processing rate of 1Hz.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.

Builds on

39 of 75 references.

References · 39

  1. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,141
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
  3. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  4. 2021Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 2,013
  5. 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,607
  6. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  7. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,313
  8. 2020NeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collectionscited by 1,230
  9. 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
  10. 2021Depth-supervised NeRF: Fewer Views and Faster Training for Freecited by 732
  11. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 731
  12. 2018Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processingcited by 717
27 more
  1. 2023Nerfstudio: A Modular Framework for Neural Radiance Field Developmentcited by 596
  2. 2018From Coarse to Fine: Robust Hierarchical Localization at Large Scalecited by 556
  3. 2022MonoSDF: Exploring Monocular Geometric Cues for Neural Implicit Surface Reconstructioncited by 467
  4. 2023Gaussian Splatting SLAMcited by 410
  5. 2021Patch-NetVLAD: Multi-Scale Fusion of Locally-Global Descriptors for Place Recognitioncited by 236
  6. 2019R2D2: Repeatable and Reliable Detector and Descriptorcited by 206
  7. 2018PointNetVLAD: Deep Point Cloud Based Retrieval for Large-Scale Place Recognitioncited by 197
  8. 2021FAST-LIO2: Fast Direct LiDAR-inertial Odometrycited by 170
  9. 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 160
  10. 2023EigenPlaces: Training Viewpoint Robust Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 109
  11. 2022MeshLoc: Mesh-Based Visual Localizationcited by 62
  12. 2021LoGG3D-Net: Locally Guided Global Descriptor Learning for 3D Place Recognitioncited by 51
  13. 2020Semantic Graph Based Place Recognition for 3D Point Cloudscited by 43
  14. 2019SegMap: Segment-based mapping and localization using data-driven descriptorscited by 42
  15. 2020Locus: LiDAR-based Place Recognition using Spatiotemporal Higher-Order Poolingcited by 38
  16. 2021AdaFusion: Visual-LiDAR Fusion with Adaptive Weights for Place Recognitioncited by 36
  17. 2023NeRF-Loc: Visual Localization with Conditional Neural Radiance Fieldcited by 29
  18. 2020Monocular Camera Localization in Prior LiDAR Maps with 2D-3D Line Correspondencescited by 23
  19. 2024The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Pre-Trained Features for Camera Pose Refinementcited by 21
  20. 2021Multi-Camera LiDAR Inertial Extension to the Newer College Datasetcited by 17
  21. 2023(LC)2: LiDAR-Camera Loop Constraints For Cross-Modal Place Recognitioncited by 16
  22. 2024SiLVR: Scalable Lidar-Visual Reconstruction with Neural Radiance Fields for Robotic Inspectioncited by 14
  23. 2023ImMesh: An Immediate LiDAR Localization and Meshing Frameworkcited by 11
  24. 2020OneShot Global Localization: Instant LiDAR-Visual Pose Estimationcited by 9
  25. 2021Spherical Multi-Modal Place Recognition for Heterogeneous Sensor Systemscited by 8
  26. 2022Semantic localization on BIM-generated maps using a 3D LiDAR sensorcited by 6
  27. 2023InstaLoc: One-shot Global Lidar Localisation in Indoor Environments through Instance Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.