mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking End-To-End Performance of AI-Based Chip Placement Algorithms

arXiv 2407.15026 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2024cs.AR cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing complexity of modern very-large-scale integration (VLSI) design highlights the significance of Electronic Design Automation (EDA) technologies. Chip placement is a critical step in the EDA workflow, which positions chip modules on the canvas with the goal of optimizing performance, power, and area (PPA) metrics of final chip designs. Recent advances have demonstrated the great potential of AI-based algorithms in enhancing chip placement. However, due to the lengthy workflow of chip design, the evaluations of these algorithms often focus on intermediate surrogate metrics, which are easy to compute but frequently reveal a substantial misalignment with the end-to-end performance (i.e., the final design PPA). To address this challenge, we introduce ChiPBench, which can effectively facilitate research in chip placement within the AI community. ChiPBench is a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the effectiveness of existing AI-based chip placement algorithms in improving final design PPA metrics. Specifically, we have gathered 20 circuits from various domains (e.g., CPU, GPU, and microcontrollers). These designs are compiled by executing the workflow from the verilog source code, which preserves necessary physical implementation kits, enabling evaluations for the placement algorithms on their impacts on the final design PPA. We executed six state-of-the-art AI-based chip placement algorithms on these designs and plugged the results of each single-point algorithm into the physical implementation workflow to obtain the final PPA results. Experimental results show that even if intermediate metric of a single-point algorithm is dominant, while the final PPA results are unsatisfactory. We believe that our benchmark will serve as an effective evaluation framework to bridge the gap between academia and industry.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2024.

Builds on

10 of 58 references.

References · 10

  1. 2021Machine Learning for Electronic Design Automation: A Surveycited by 72
  2. 2021On Joint Learning for Solving Placement and Routing in Chip Designcited by 44
  3. 2022MaskPlace: Fast Chip Placement via Reinforced Visual Representation Learningcited by 43
  4. 2023ChiPFormer: Transferable Chip Placement via Offline Decision Transformercited by 42
  5. 2021OpenABC-D: A Large-Scale Dataset For Machine Learning Guided Integrated Circuit Synthesiscited by 30
  6. 2023Macro Placement by Wire-Mask-Guided Black-Box Optimizationcited by 23
  7. 2020Placement in Integrated Circuits using Cyclic Reinforcement Learning and Simulated Annealingcited by 12
  8. 2023An Updated Assessment of Reinforcement Learning for Macro Placementcited by 11
  9. 2023Hier-RTLMP: A Hierarchical Automatic Macro Placer for Large-scale Complex IP Blockscited by 11
  10. 2023A Circuit Domain Generalization Framework for Efficient Logic Synthesis in Chip Designcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: