mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integrity

arXiv 2407.13105 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and Gemini has posed new challenges for the academic community. With the help of these models, students can easily complete their assignments and exams, while educators struggle to detect AI-generated content. This has led to a surge in academic misconduct, as students present work generated by LLMs as their own, without putting in the effort required for learning. As AI tools become more advanced and produce increasingly human-like text, detecting such content becomes more challenging. This development has significantly impacted the academic world, where many educators are finding it difficult to adapt their assessment methods to this challenge. This research first demonstrates how LLMs have increased academic dishonesty, and then reviews state-of-the-art solutions for academic plagiarism in detail. A survey of datasets, algorithms, tools, and evasion strategies for plagiarism detection has been conducted, focusing on how LLMs and AI-generated content (AIGC) detection have affected this area. The survey aims to identify the gaps in existing solutions. Lastly, potential long-term solutions are presented to address the issue of academic plagiarism using LLMs based on AI tools and educational approaches in an ever-changing world.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 135 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

48 of 135 references.

References · 48

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  3. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  4. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  5. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  6. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  7. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  8. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  9. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  10. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  11. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 259
  12. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
36 more
  1. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  2. 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 203
  3. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  4. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  5. 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 121
  6. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  7. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 90
  8. 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 86
  9. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 79
  10. 2023Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Modelscited by 68
  11. 2019Garbage In, Garbage Out? Do Machine Learning Application Papers in Social Computing Report Where Human-Labeled Training Data Comes From?cited by 64
  12. 2024Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA Rewritingcited by 51
  13. 2024WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-offcited by 48
  14. 2023Large Language Models can be Guided to Evade AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  15. 2024M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 43
  16. 2023Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detectioncited by 41
  17. 2023ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT modelscited by 41
  18. 2021Tracing Text Provenance via Context-Aware Lexical Substitutioncited by 40
  19. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 40
  20. 2023CHEAT: A Large-scale Dataset for Detecting ChatGPT-writtEn AbsTractscited by 39
  21. 2023Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 35
  22. 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Modelscited by 30
  23. 2024Can Watermarks Survive Translation? On the Cross-lingual Consistency of Text Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 27
  24. 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attackscited by 25
  25. 2024Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutionscited by 24
  26. 2023Towards a Robust Detection of Language Model Generated Text: Is ChatGPT that Easy to Detect?cited by 23
  27. 2017Train Once, Test Anywhere: Zero-Shot Learning for Text Classificationcited by 22
  28. 2024Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 19
  29. 2023Evade ChatGPT Detectors via A Single Spacecited by 18
  30. 2021Identifying Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarismcited by 16
  31. 2024Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detectioncited by 10
  32. 2024LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 10
  33. 2023An Empirical Study of AI Generated Text Detection Toolscited by 9
  34. 2017N-gram Language Modeling using Recurrent Neural Network Estimationcited by 6
  35. 2021Detecting Cross-Language Plagiarism using Open Knowledge Graphscited by 1
  36. 2022A Survey of Plagiarism Detection Systems: Case of Use with English, French and Arabic Languagescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.