mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PlagBench: Exploring the Duality of Large Language Models in Plagiarism Generation and Detection

arXiv 2406.16288 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies have raised concerns about the potential threats large language models (LLMs) pose to academic integrity and copyright protection. Yet, their investigation is predominantly focused on literal copies of original texts. Also, how LLMs can facilitate the detection of LLM-generated plagiarism remains largely unexplored. To address these gaps, we introduce textbfsf PlagBench, a dataset of 46.5K synthetic text pairs that represent three major types of plagiarism: verbatim copying, paraphrasing, and summarization. These samples are generated by three advanced LLMs. We rigorously validate the quality of PlagBench through a combination of fine-grained automatic evaluation and human annotation. We then utilize this dataset for two purposes: (1) to examine LLMs' ability to transform original content into accurate paraphrases and summaries, and (2) to evaluate the plagiarism detection performance of five modern LLMs alongside three specialized plagiarism checkers. Our results show that GPT-3.5 Turbo can produce high-quality paraphrases and summaries without significantly increasing text complexity compared to GPT-4 Turbo. However, in terms of detection, GPT-4 outperforms other LLMs and commercial detection tools by 20%, highlights the evolving capabilities of LLMs not only in content generation but also in plagiarism detection. Data and source code are available at https://github.com/Brit7777/plagbench.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

37 of 75 references.

References · 37

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  7. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  8. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  9. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  10. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  11. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  12. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
25 more
  1. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  2. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
  3. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  4. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  5. 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 477
  6. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
  7. 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 413
  8. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  9. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  10. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  11. 2022News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3cited by 324
  12. 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 284
  13. 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 194
  14. 2024Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Modelscited by 146
  15. 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 141
  16. 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
  17. 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 86
  18. 2020Fill in the BLANC: Human-free quality estimation of document summariescited by 80
  19. 2022How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarismcited by 38
  20. 2020GRUEN for Evaluating Linguistic Quality of Generated Textcited by 37
  21. 2022On the Evaluation Metrics for Paraphrase Generationcited by 32
  22. 2021SciXGen: A Scientific Paper Dataset for Context-Aware Text Generationcited by 22
  23. 2021Are Neural Language Models Good Plagiarists? A Benchmark for Neural Paraphrase Detectioncited by 17
  24. 2023Paraphrase Detection: Human vs. Machine Contentcited by 12
  25. 2024Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integritycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.