LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
ChatGPT and other general large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success, but they have also raised concerns about the misuse of AI-generated texts. Existing AI-generated text detection models, such as based on BERT and RoBERTa, are prone to in-domain over-fitting, leading to poor out-of-domain (OOD) detection performance. In this paper, we first collected Chinese text responses generated by human experts and 9 types of LLMs, for which to multiple domains questions, and further created a dataset that mixed human-written sentences and sentences polished by LLMs. We then proposed LLM-Detector, a novel method for both document-level and sentence-level text detection through Instruction Tuning of LLMs. Our method leverages the wealth of knowledge LLMs acquire during pre-training, enabling them to detect the text they generate. Instruction tuning aligns the model's responses with the user's expected text detection tasks. Experimental results show that previous methods struggle with sentence-level AI-generated text detection and OOD detection. In contrast, our proposed method not only significantly outperforms baseline methods in both sentence-level and document-level text detection but also demonstrates strong generalization capabilities. Furthermore, since LLM-Detector is trained based on open-source LLMs, it is easy to customize for deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
8 more
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
- 2021ZeRO-Infinity: Breaking the GPU Memory Wall for Extreme Scale Deep Learningcited by 253
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
- 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
- 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
- 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 59
- 2023Origin Tracing and Detecting of LLMscited by 39
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2025Frankentext: Stitching random text fragments into long-form narrativescited by 8
- 2025Diversity Boosts AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 6
- 2024Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integritycited by 5
- 2024HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainabilitycited by 3
- 2024Controlling Out-of-Domain Gaps in LLMs for Genre Classification and Generated Text Detectioncited by 3
- 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?cited by 3
- 2024MasonTigers at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Performance Analysis of Transformer-based Models on Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 1
- 2025LLM Encoder vs. Decoder: Robust Detection of Chinese AI-Generated Text with LoRAcited by 1
- 2026Who Wrote This Line? Evaluating the Detection of LLM-Generated Classical Chinese Poetrycited by 1
- 2026Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancementcited by 0
- 2026Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancement22 May 2026
- 2026Who Wrote This Line? Evaluating the Detection of LLM-Generated Classical Chinese Poetry11 Apr 2026
- 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?23 Oct 2025
- 2025Diversity Boosts AI-Generated Text Detection23 Sep 2025
- 2025LLM Encoder vs. Decoder: Robust Detection of Chinese AI-Generated Text with LoRA31 Aug 2025
- 2025Frankentext: Stitching random text fragments into long-form narratives23 May 2025
- 2024Controlling Out-of-Domain Gaps in LLMs for Genre Classification and Generated Text Detection29 Dec 2024
- 2024HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainability7 Sep 2024
- 2024Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integrity4 Jun 2024
- 2024MasonTigers at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Performance Analysis of Transformer-based Models on Machine-Generated Text Detection22 Mar 2024