mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An accurate detection is not all you need to combat label noise in web-noisy datasets

arXiv 2407.05528 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training a classifier on web-crawled data demands learning algorithms that are robust to annotation errors and irrelevant examples. This paper builds upon the recent empirical observation that applying unsupervised contrastive learning to noisy, web-crawled datasets yields a feature representation under which the in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) samples are linearly separable. We show that direct estimation of the separating hyperplane can indeed offer an accurate detection of OOD samples, and yet, surprisingly, this detection does not translate into gains in classification accuracy. Digging deeper into this phenomenon, we discover that the near-perfect detection misses a type of clean examples that are valuable for supervised learning. These examples often represent visually simple images, which are relatively easy to identify as clean examples using standard loss- or distance-based methods despite being poorly separated from the OOD distribution using unsupervised learning. Because we further observe a low correlation with SOTA metrics, this urges us to propose a hybrid solution that alternates between noise detection using linear separation and a state-of-the-art (SOTA) small-loss approach. When combined with the SOTA algorithm PLS, we substantially improve SOTA results for real-world image classification in the presence of web noise github.com/PaulAlbert31/LSA

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.

Builds on

45 of 56 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  6. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  7. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  8. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  9. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  10. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  11. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  12. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
33 more
  1. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  2. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  3. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  4. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  5. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
  6. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  8. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  9. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  10. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  11. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  12. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  13. 2021Solo-learn: A Library of Self-supervised Methods for Visual Representation Learningcited by 116
  14. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  15. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  16. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  17. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  18. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  19. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  20. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  21. 2021Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learningcited by 38
  22. 2021Webly Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Benchmark Datasets and An Approachcited by 32
  23. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  24. 2023Twin Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 28
  25. 2020i-Mix: A Domain-Agnostic Strategy for Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 19
  26. 2021PropMix: Hard Sample Filtering and Proportional MixUp for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17
  27. 2019Towards Robust Learning with Different Label Noise Distributionscited by 14
  28. 2021Addressing out-of-distribution label noise in webly-labelled datacited by 14
  29. 2021ScanMix: Learning from Severe Label Noise via Semantic Clustering and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 13
  30. 2022Is your noise correction noisy? PLS: Robustness to label noise with two stage detectioncited by 11
  31. 2023Manifold DivideMix: A Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Severe Label Noisecited by 9
  32. 2022Embedding contrastive unsupervised features to cluster in- and out-of-distribution noise in corrupted image datasetscited by 6
  33. 2024Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizationscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.