mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing out-of-distribution label noise in webly-labelled data

arXiv 2110.13699 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2021cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A recurring focus of the deep learning community is towards reducing the labeling effort. Data gathering and annotation using a search engine is a simple alternative to generating a fully human-annotated and human-gathered dataset. Although web crawling is very time efficient, some of the retrieved images are unavoidably noisy, i.e. incorrectly labeled. Designing robust algorithms for training on noisy data gathered from the web is an important research perspective that would render the building of datasets easier. In this paper we conduct a study to understand the type of label noise to expect when building a dataset using a search engine. We review the current limitations of state-of-the-art methods for dealing with noisy labels for image classification tasks in the case of web noise distribution. We propose a simple solution to bridge the gap with a fully clean dataset using Dynamic Softening of Out-of-distribution Samples (DSOS), which we design on corrupted versions of the CIFAR-100 dataset, and compare against state-of-the-art algorithms on the web noise perturbated MiniImageNet and Stanford datasets and on real label noise datasets: WebVision 1.0 and Clothing1M. Our work is fully reproducible https://git.io/JKGcj

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2021.

Builds on

42 of 52 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  7. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  8. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  9. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  10. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  11. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  12. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
30 more
  1. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  2. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  3. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  4. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  5. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  6. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  7. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  8. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
  9. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  10. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  11. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  12. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  13. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  14. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  15. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  16. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  17. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  18. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  19. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  20. 2018Out-of-Distribution Detection Using an Ensemble of Self Supervised Leave-out Classifierscited by 126
  21. 2019Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection by Maximum Classifier Discrepancycited by 112
  22. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  23. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  24. 2018A Semi-Supervised Two-Stage Approach to Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 29
  25. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  26. 2020Learning Soft Labels via Meta Learningcited by 27
  27. 2019Towards Robust Learning with Different Label Noise Distributionscited by 14
  28. 2019Uncertainty Based Detection and Relabeling of Noisy Image Labelscited by 10
  29. 2020Soft Labeling Affects Out-of-Distribution Detection of Deep Neural Networkscited by 5
  30. 2020Reliable Label Bootstrapping for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: