Improving code-mixed hate detection by native sample mixing: A case study for Hindi-English code-mixed scenario
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hate detection has long been a challenging task for the NLP community. The task becomes complex in a code-mixed environment because the models must understand the context and the hate expressed through language alteration. Compared to the monolingual setup, we see much less work on code-mixed hate as large-scale annotated hate corpora are unavailable for the study. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose using native language hate samples (native language samples/ native samples hereafter). We hypothesise that in the era of multilingual language models (MLMs), hate in code-mixed settings can be detected by majorly relying on the native language samples. Even though the NLP literature reports the effectiveness of MLMs on hate detection in many cross-lingual settings, their extensive evaluation in a code-mixed scenario is yet to be done. This paper attempts to fill this gap through rigorous empirical experiments. We considered the Hindi-English code-mixed setup as a case study as we have the linguistic expertise for the same. Some of the interesting observations we got are: (i) adding native hate samples in the code-mixed training set, even in small quantity, improved the performance of MLMs for code-mixed hate detection, (ii) MLMs trained with native samples alone observed to be detecting code-mixed hate to a large extent, (iii) the visualisation of attention scores revealed that, when native samples were included in training, MLMs could better focus on the hate emitting words in the code-mixed context, and (iv) finally, when hate is subjective or sarcastic, naively mixing native samples doesn't help much to detect code-mixed hate. We will release the data and code repository to reproduce the reported results.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.
Builds on
22 of 62 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
- 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,090
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
- 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 210
- 2021MuRIL: Multilingual Representations for Indian Languagescited by 179
- 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
- 2019A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speechcited by 129
- 2019CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 110
- 2019Exploring Hate Speech Detection in Multimodal Publicationscited by 103
10 more
- 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 96
- 2017Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Modelscited by 72
- 2018Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Datacited by 40
- 2021BERT, mBERT, or BiBERT? A Study on Contextualized Embeddings for Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
- 2022Mono vs Multilingual BERT for Hate Speech Detection and Text Classification: A Case Study in Marathicited by 16
- 2022HateCheckHIn: Evaluating Hindi Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 15
- 2018A Quality Type-aware Annotated Corpus and Lexicon for Harassment Researchcited by 11
- 2023BERTwich: Extending BERT's Capabilities to Model Dialectal and Noisy Textcited by 6
- 2023Down the Rabbit Hole: Detecting Online Extremism, Radicalisation, and Politicised Hate Speechcited by 5
- 2020Stacked DeBERT: All Attention in Incomplete Data for Text Classificationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.