mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Stress-Testing Capability Elicitation With Password-Locked Models

arXiv 2405.19550 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 43

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To determine the safety of large language models (LLMs), AI developers must be able to assess their dangerous capabilities. But simple prompting strategies often fail to elicit an LLM's full capabilities. One way to elicit capabilities more robustly is to fine-tune the LLM to complete the task. In this paper, we investigate the conditions under which fine-tuning-based elicitation suffices to elicit capabilities. To do this, we introduce password-locked models, LLMs fine-tuned such that some of their capabilities are deliberately hidden. Specifically, these LLMs are trained to exhibit these capabilities only when a password is present in the prompt, and to imitate a much weaker LLM otherwise. Password-locked models enable a novel method of evaluating capabilities elicitation methods, by testing whether these password-locked capabilities can be elicited without using the password. We find that a few high-quality demonstrations are often sufficient to fully elicit password-locked capabilities. More surprisingly, fine-tuning can elicit other capabilities that have been locked using the same password, or even different passwords. Furthermore, when only evaluations, and not demonstrations, are available, approaches like reinforcement learning are still often able to elicit capabilities. Overall, our findings suggest that fine-tuning is an effective method of eliciting hidden capabilities of current models, but may be unreliable when high-quality demonstrations are not available, e.g. as may be the case when models' (hidden) capabilities exceed those of human demonstrators.

Key facts. Cited by 43 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

53 of 64 references.

References · 53

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,278
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,376
  6. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,091
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,986
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,876
  9. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,831
  10. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,270
  11. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,117
  12. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,573
38 more
  1. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,123
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,218
  3. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,761
  4. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,736
  5. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,369
  6. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,141
  7. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 891
  8. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 824
  9. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 680
  10. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 666
  11. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 634
  12. 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 508
  13. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 498
  14. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 481
  15. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 454
  16. 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 451
  17. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 425
  18. 2020Backdoor Learning: A Surveycited by 424
  19. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 393
  20. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 374
  21. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 293
  22. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 254
  23. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 252
  24. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow with Deep Learning and Tree Searchcited by 246
  25. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 246
  26. 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 195
  27. 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70Bcited by 192
  28. 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 186
  29. 2023Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuningcited by 169
  30. 2024Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMscited by 159
  31. 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
  32. 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 126
  33. 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 125
  34. 2023Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined taskscited by 113
  35. 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Taskscited by 96
  36. 2022Exploring the Limits of Domain-Adaptive Training for Detoxifying Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 68
  37. 2022Self-Destructing Models: Increasing the Costs of Harmful Dual Uses of Foundation Modelscited by 56
  38. 2024sDPO: Don't Use Your Data All at Oncecited by 46

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 15; 2026: 20.

43 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 270
  2. 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 169
  3. 2024AI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on Evaluationscited by 139
  4. 2024Sabotage Evaluations for Frontier Modelscited by 49
  5. 2025Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilitiescited by 37
  6. 2024Emergence of Hidden Capabilities: Exploring Learning Dynamics in Concept Spacecited by 34
  7. 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robotscited by 34
  8. 2024Towards evaluations-based safety cases for AI schemingcited by 32
  9. 2025Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Modelscited by 31
  10. 2024Noise Injection Reveals Hidden Capabilities of Sandbagging Language Modelscited by 23
  11. 2025Async Control: Stress-testing Asynchronous Control Measures for LLM Agentscited by 22
  12. 2025Forecasting Rare Language Model Behaviorscited by 17
31 more
  1. 2025The Elicitation Game: Evaluating Capability Elicitation Techniquescited by 16
  2. 2025The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Prioritiescited by 9
  3. 2025Neural Chameleons: Language Models Can Learn to Hide Their Thoughts from Unseen Activation Monitorscited by 8
  4. 2026A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoringcited by 7
  5. 2025The Shape of Adversarial Influence: Characterizing LLM Latent Spaces with Persistent Homologycited by 5
  6. 2025Prompt Attacks Reveal Superficial Knowledge Removal in Unlearning Methodscited by 5
  7. 2024What AI evaluations for preventing catastrophic risks can and cannot docited by 4
  8. 2025Adaptively profiling models with task elicitationcited by 4
  9. 2026Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 4
  10. 2026Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reportingcited by 4
  11. 2025Evaluating Language Model Reasoning about Confidential Informationcited by 3
  12. 2026Fundamental Limits of Black-Box Safety Evaluation: Information-Theoretic and Computational Barriers from Latent Context Conditioningcited by 3
  13. 2026"Did you lie?" Evaluating Lie Detectors across Model Scale and Belief-Verified Model Organismscited by 2
  14. 2026Routing Subspaces: Auditing Evaluation-to-Deployment Mismatch in Fine-Tuned Language Modelscited by 2
  15. 2025Layered Unlearning for Adversarial Relearningcited by 1
  16. 2025Locket: Robust Feature-Locking Technique for Language Modelscited by 1
  17. 2026Mechanistic Anomaly Detection via Functional Attributioncited by 1
  18. 2026LLMs Can Leak Training Data But Do They Want To? A Propensity-Aware Evaluation of Memorization in LLMscited by 1
  19. 2026Generalization Hacking: Models Can Game Reinforcement Learning by Preventing Behavioral Generalizationcited by 1
  20. 2026Reference-Grafting Matches Fine-Tuning at Eliciting Sandbagged Capabilitiescited by 1
  21. 2026A Causal Model for Locating and Unlocking Sandbagging in Model Organismscited by 1
  22. 2025Password-Activated Shutdown Protocols for Misaligned Frontier Agentscited by 0
  23. 2026Backdoor4Good: Benchmarking Beneficial Uses of Backdoors in LLMscited by 0
  24. 2026Seamless Deception: Larger Language Models Are Better Knowledge Concealerscited by 0
  25. 2026MIRAGE: A Polarity-Flipping Encoding Subspace in LLM Agentscited by 0
  26. 2026Toward Open Weight Models Without Risks: Separating Public and Private Capabilities in LLMscited by 0
  27. 2026Demonstrating Generalization Failures via Mixtures of Conditional Policiescited by 0
  28. 2026Fool's Gold: Defensive Deception Against Safety-Removal Attacks on Open-Weight Modelscited by 0
  29. 2026A Lie Detector Test for Language Models: Reading Knowledge a Model Won't Revealcited by 0
  30. 2026Activation Flow: Manufacturing Activations for Steeringcited by 0
  31. 2026LLMs Learn to Evade Latent Monitors from Prior Feedback Alonecited by 0