mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Open Weight Models Without Risks: Separating Public and Private Capabilities in LLMs

arXiv 2606.21638 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-weight Large Language Models (LLMs) enable scientific progress and broad deployment. However, they make it difficult to control access to sensitive capabilities. Current practice either suppresses dangerous capabilities before release or mediates access through closed services that use specialized model variants, input/output monitors, and API permissions. The former is susceptible to jailbreaks while sacrificing capability for all users to mitigate the risks posed by a few, and the latter is fundamentally incompatible with open-weight release. In this paper, we propose Tiered Language Models (TLMs), where a single set of released weights supports multiple capability levels. In its default public configuration, a TLM behaves as a conventional LLM. A compact secret key specifies a permutation over a small parameter subset, inducing an alternative computation graph over the same weights that exposes additional capabilities. We develop a training protocol that jointly pretrains both configurations from scratch, then fine-tunes the keyed configuration on private data with regularization to preserve the public model's behavior. We pretrain 180M- and 650M-parameter TLMs and demonstrate that the keyed configuration can acquire a new language, gain instruction-following ability, and memorize private factual knowledge, whereas the public configuration exhibits none of these capabilities. Moreover, we show that our approach extends naturally to multiple hierarchical tiers. Because authorization operates on the model's weight structure rather than in the input space, the mechanism resists fine-tuning-based extraction and partial key compromise. In general, TLMs take a step toward reconciling open-weight release with selective capability control.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

21 of 33 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  6. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 368
  7. 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 172
  8. 2023S-LoRA: Serving Thousands of Concurrent LoRA Adapterscited by 146
  9. 2025FineWeb2: One Pipeline to Scale Them All -- Adapting Pre-Training Data Processing to Every Languagecited by 134
  10. 2023Punica: Multi-Tenant LoRA Servingcited by 80
  11. 2019Superposition of many models into onecited by 64
  12. 2024On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Modelscited by 64
9 more
  1. 2024MuxServe: Flexible Spatial-Temporal Multiplexing for Multiple LLM Servingcited by 49
  2. 2024Stress-Testing Capability Elicitation With Password-Locked Modelscited by 42
  3. 2025DataDecide: How to Predict Best Pretraining Data with Small Experimentscited by 36
  4. 2023Open-Sourcing Highly Capable Foundation Models: An evaluation of risks, benefits, and alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectivescited by 31
  5. 2024AdapterSwap: Continuous Training of LLMs with Data Removal and Access-Control Guaranteescited by 14
  6. 2025FlexOlmo: Open Language Models for Flexible Data Usecited by 14
  7. 2024A Middle Path for On-Premises LLM Deployment: Preserving Privacy Without Sacrificing Model Confidentialitycited by 8
  8. 2024SudoLM: Learning Access Control of Parametric Knowledge with Authorization Alignmentcited by 8
  9. 2025Locket: Robust Feature-Locking Technique for Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.