mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Activation Flow: Manufacturing Activations for Steering

arXiv 2609.32530 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Difference-in-means steering requires activations recorded while a model shows the desired behavior, which a sandbagging model withholds by deliberately underperforming. We introduce Activation Flow (ActFlow), which manufactures these activations from k correct labels without fine-tuning. ActFlow sets target logits that rank each labeled item's correct answer first, and moves the logits toward them by adding one vector x to all k residual streams at one layer. ActFlow is a family of ordinary differential equations for x, one for each rule that maps the required logit change to the velocity of x. The smallest-norm rule lands exactly on the targets, while the others keep only the top singular directions of the Jacobian. We test ActFlow on three instruction-tuned models, each locked by a sandbagging prompt and by a password-locked LoRA. At k=40, ActFlow keeping five singular directions raises the mean held-out ARC-Easy accuracy over the six locked models from 0.05 to 0.85, against 0.88 for rank-16 LoRA fine-tuning, which trains about 3,000 times as many parameters, and 0.92 for the honest models. Furthermore, it scores higher than the smallest-norm rule in 16 of the 18 combinations of locked model and k, and its steering direction is nearly orthogonal to the honest difference-in-means direction. It also unlocks two LoRA locks where the honest direction fails. Surprisingly, with one labeled item, the single-step smallest-norm rule raises the Qwen2.5-7B prompt lock from 0.04 to 0.59.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

31 of 51 references.

References · 31

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  5. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  6. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  7. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  8. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
  9. 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 197
  10. 2024AI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on Evaluationscited by 145
  11. 2026Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Modelscited by 75
  12. 2024Stress-Testing Capability Elicitation With Password-Locked Modelscited by 46
19 more
  1. 2025Language Models are Injective and Hence Invertiblecited by 35
  2. 2024Refusal in LLMs is an Affine Functioncited by 29
  3. 2025One-shot Optimized Steering Vectors Mediate Safety-relevant Behaviors in LLMscited by 29
  4. 2026Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behaviorcited by 26
  5. 2024Noise Injection Reveals Hidden Capabilities of Sandbagging Language Modelscited by 24
  6. 2024Relational Composition in Neural Networks: A Survey and Call to Actioncited by 23
  7. 2025The Elicitation Game: Evaluating Capability Elicitation Techniquescited by 18
  8. 2026The Shape of Beliefs: Geometry, Dynamics, and Interventions along Representation Manifolds of Language Models' Posteriorscited by 15
  9. 2025Small Vectors, Big Effects: A Mechanistic Study of RL-Induced Reasoning via Steering Vectorscited by 8
  10. 2026On the Non-Identifiability of Steering Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 8
  11. 2026Steered LLM Activations are Non-Surjectivecited by 8
  12. 2026FishBack: Pullback Fisher Geometry for Optimal Activation Steering in Transformerscited by 6
  13. 2026The Model Organism Lottery: Model Organism Interpretability Strongly Depends on Training Methodologycited by 6
  14. 2026Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 4
  15. 2026Mechanistically Eliciting Latent Behaviors in Language Modelscited by 3
  16. 2026Routing Subspaces: Auditing Evaluation-to-Deployment Mismatch in Fine-Tuned Language Modelscited by 2
  17. 2026The information geometry of large language models is shared, learned, and controllablecited by 2
  18. 2026Reference-Grafting Matches Fine-Tuning at Eliciting Sandbagged Capabilitiescited by 1
  19. 2026A Causal Model for Locating and Unlocking Sandbagging in Model Organismscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.