mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Who's Behind the Text? Robust Model Authorship Attribution

arXiv 2610.19583 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate text, their misuse has become a growing societal problem, with implications for academic misconduct, model distillation, and cyberattacks. For these reasons, Model Authorship Attribution (MAA), which identifies the source model of a given text, is important for promoting the responsible use of LLMs and improving AI safety. In practice, attribution systems must remain reliable beyond the distributions observed during training. They may encounter texts from unseen domains and writing settings, as well as generations from future versions of model families that were not available when the system was trained. However, existing MAA methods often exhibit substantial performance degradation under such distribution shifts. To address this challenge, we propose Authorship Tracing via Likelihood-based Attribution of Sources (ATLAS), which formulates MAA through source-conditioned text modeling rather than direct source prediction. ATLAS learns how text from each source family is generated and attributes a given text by comparing its likelihood under each learned source condition. We aggregate this likelihood evidence at the token level with clipping so that no single token dominates the decision. We further introduce MAABench, a broad MAA benchmark for evaluating practical OOD settings such as domain and version. Our experiments show that ATLAS consistently outperforms existing baselines across MAABench and OpenTuringBench. In particular, when both the generation domain and the model version change on MAABench, ATLAS achieves 74.27% accuracy, 9.00pp higher than the strongest baseline. Beyond MAA, ATLAS can also help identify distillation source models by measuring which source model a target LLM most closely resembles. Our extended experiments show that ATLAS recovers the known teacher of every distilled model we evaluate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

32 of 43 references.

References · 32

  1. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  2. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  3. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  4. 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
  5. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  6. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  7. 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224
  8. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
  9. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
  10. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 129
  11. 2024HydraLoRA: An Asymmetric LoRA Architecture for Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 123
  12. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 121
20 more
  1. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
  2. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 105
  3. 2019On the Use of ArXiv as a Datasetcited by 103
  4. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
  5. 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
  6. 2023LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Toolcited by 45
  7. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 43
  8. 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 40
  9. 2024DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarioscited by 38
  10. 2022The Harvard USPTO Patent Dataset: A Large-Scale, Well-Structured, and Multi-Purpose Corpus of Patent Applicationscited by 33
  11. 2025Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Modelscited by 33
  12. 2023Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Textcited by 27
  13. 2024ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generationscited by 11
  14. 2025OpenTuringBench: An Open-Model-based Benchmark and Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection and Attributioncited by 9
  15. 2025DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Modelscited by 9
  16. 2025Authorship Attribution in Multilingual Machine-Generated Textscited by 8
  17. 2025Generative Classifiers Avoid Shortcut Solutionscited by 8
  18. 2026Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Modelcited by 4
  19. 2026Minimizing Mismatch Risk: A Prototype-Based Routing Framework for Zero-shot LLM-generated Text Detectioncited by 3
  20. 2026When New Generators Arrive: Lifelong Machine-Generated Text Attribution via Ridge Feature Transfercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.