mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Alignment Imprint: Zero-Shot AI-Generated Text Detection via Provable Preference Discrepancy

arXiv 2604.16923 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting AI-generated text is an important but challenging problem. Existing likelihood-based detection methods are often sensitive to content complexity and may exhibit unstable performance. In this paper, our key insight is that modern Large Language Models (LLMs) undergo alignment (including fine-tuning and preference tuning), leaving a measurable distributional imprint. We theoretically derive this imprint by abstracting the alignment process as a sequence of constrained optimization steps, showing that the log-likelihood ratio can naturally decompose into implicit instructional biases and preference rewards. We refer to this quantity as the Alignment Imprint. Furthermore, to mitigate the instability in high-entropy regions, we introduce Log-likelihood Alignment Preference Discrepancy (LAPD), a standardized information-weighted statistic based on alignment imprint. We provide statistical guarantee that alignment-based statistics dominate Fast-DetectGPT in performance. We also theoretically show that LAPD strictly improves the unweighted alignment scores when the aligned and base models are close in distribution. Extensive experiments show that LAPD achieves an improvement 45.82% relative to the strongest existing baselines, yielding large and consistent gains across all settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2026.

Builds on

32 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 31

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  9. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  11. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  12. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
19 more
  1. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  2. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
  3. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  4. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  5. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  6. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
  7. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
  8. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  9. 2024DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarioscited by 37
  10. 2024Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability Sequencescited by 33
  11. 2024Imitate Before Detect: Aligning Machine Stylistic Preference for Machine-Revised Text Detectioncited by 23
  12. 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guaranteescited by 20
  13. 2024ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generationscited by 10
  14. 2025Reliably Bounding False Positives: A Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection Framework via Multiscaled Conformal Predictioncited by 10
  15. 2025Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectorscited by 10
  16. 2025DNA-DetectLLM: Unveiling AI-Generated Text via a DNA-Inspired Mutation-Repair Paradigmcited by 10
  17. 2025MoSEs: Uncertainty-Aware AI-Generated Text Detection via Mixture of Stylistics Experts with Conditional Thresholdscited by 9
  18. 2024A Theory of Response Sampling in LLMs: Part Descriptive and Part Prescriptivecited by 8
  19. 2026C-ReD: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for AI-Generated Text Detection Derived from Real-World Promptscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Anchored Preference Optimization and Contrastive Revisions: Addressing Underspecification in Alignment
  2. 2025Alignment-Aware Decoding
  3. 2024Noise Contrastive Alignment of Language Models with Explicit Rewards
  4. 2026Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models
  5. 2025HLPD: Aligning LLMs to Human Language Preference for Machine-Revised Text Detection
  6. 2026AlignDiff: Exploiting Model-Intrinsic Information for Better Preference Data Selection
  7. 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Alignment Algorithms in Language Models
  8. 2025ComPO: Preference Alignment via Comparison Oracles