mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Online Detection of LLM-Generated Texts via Sequential Hypothesis Testing by Betting

arXiv 2410.22318 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing algorithms to differentiate between machine-generated texts and human-written texts has garnered substantial attention in recent years. Existing methods in this direction typically concern an offline setting where a dataset containing a mix of real and machine-generated texts is given upfront, and the task is to determine whether each sample in the dataset is from a large language model (LLM) or a human. However, in many practical scenarios, sources such as news websites, social media accounts, and online forums publish content in a streaming fashion. Therefore, in this online scenario, how to quickly and accurately determine whether the source is an LLM with strong statistical guarantees is crucial for these media or platforms to function effectively and prevent the spread of misinformation and other potential misuse of LLMs. To tackle the problem of online detection, we develop an algorithm based on the techniques of sequential hypothesis testing by betting that not only builds upon and complements existing offline detection techniques but also enjoys statistical guarantees, which include a controlled false positive rate and the expected time to correctly identify a source as an LLM. Experiments were conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.

Builds on

60 of 90 references.

References · 60

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  6. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  8. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  9. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  11. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  12. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
38 more
  1. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  2. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  3. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
  4. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
  5. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 445
  6. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
  7. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 299
  8. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  9. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  10. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
  11. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 226
  12. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
  13. 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 177
  14. 2020Estimating means of bounded random variables by bettingcited by 169
  15. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 166
  16. 2022Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inferencecited by 155
  17. 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 133
  18. 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130
  19. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 129
  20. 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
  21. 2018Black-Box Reductions for Parameter-free Online Learning in Banach Spacescited by 125
  22. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  23. 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 99
  24. 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
  25. 2022ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?cited by 88
  26. 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 78
  27. 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 73
  28. 2017Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterizationcited by 64
  29. 2021There are natural scores: Full comment on Shafer, "Testing by betting: A strategy for statistical and scientific communication"cited by 53
  30. 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 52
  31. 2024Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA Rewritingcited by 52
  32. 2021Tight Concentrations and Confidence Sequences from the Regret of Universal Portfoliocited by 43
  33. 2016BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Botscited by 41
  34. 2021Nonparametric Two-Sample Testing by Bettingcited by 37
  35. 2023Auditing Fairness by Bettingcited by 25
  36. 2024Protected Test-Time Adaptation via Online Entropy Matching: A Betting Approachcited by 23
  37. 2023Sequential Predictive Two-Sample and Independence Testingcited by 21
  38. 2015Sequential Nonparametric Testing with the Law of the Iterated Logarithmcited by 20

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 9.

11 papers.