mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Verifiable by Design: Aligning Language Models to Quote from Pre-Training Data

arXiv 2404.03862 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 13

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

To trust the fluent generations of large language models (LLMs), humans must be able to verify their correctness against trusted, external sources. Recent efforts, such as providing citations via retrieved documents or post-hoc provenance, enhance verifiability but provide no guarantees on their correctness. To address these limitations, we tackle the verifiability goal with a different philosophy: trivializing the verification process by developing models that quote verbatim statements from trusted sources in their pre-training data. We propose Quote-Tuning, which demonstrates the feasibility of aligning models to quote. The core of Quote-Tuning is a fast membership inference function that efficiently verifies text against trusted corpora. We leverage this tool to design a reward function to quantify quotes in model responses, and curate datasets for preference learning. Experiments show that Quote-Tuning significantly increases verbatim quotes from high-quality documents by up to 130% relative to base models while maintaining response quality. Quote-Tuning is applicable in different tasks, generalizes to out-of-domain data and diverse model families, and provides additional benefits to truthfulness. Our method not only serves as a hassle-free method to increase quoting but also opens up avenues for improving LLM trustworthiness through better verifiability.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 70 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2024.

Builds on

70 of 94 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Loss27 Dec
  2. 2023Alignment for Honesty12 Dec
  3. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 66

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  9. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  10. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  11. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  12. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
38 more
  1. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  5. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  6. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  7. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  8. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  9. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
  10. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  11. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  12. 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
  13. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  14. 2019Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 788
  15. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  16. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  17. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  18. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  19. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
  20. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  21. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
  22. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  23. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
  24. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
  25. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
  26. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  27. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 319
  28. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  29. 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 297
  30. 2022Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotescited by 290
  31. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 285
  32. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 232
  33. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
  34. 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 180
  35. 2023Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 147
  36. 2024Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Modelscited by 146
  37. 2022Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Modelscited by 108
  38. 2022Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacycited by 97

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Trusted Source Alignment in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Aligning Large Language Models for Faithful Integrity Against Opposing Argument
  3. 2026GenProve: Learning to Generate Text with Fine-Grained Provenance
  4. 2026Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization
  5. 2026The ACUTE Protocol: Operationalizing Language Model Activations for Better Calibration, Utility, and Trust
  6. 2026Consensus is Not Verification: Why Crowd Wisdom Strategies Fail for LLM Truthfulness
  7. 2024When to Trust LLMs: Aligning Confidence with Response Quality
  8. 2024To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contexts