mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generation

arXiv 2604.01432 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Citation granularity -- whether to cite individual sentences, paragraphs, or documents -- is a critical design choice in attributed generation. While fine-grained citations are commonly preferred for precise human verification, their impact on model performance remains under-explored. We analyze four model scales (8B-120B) and demonstrate that enforcing fine-grained (sentence-level) citations forfeits gains of 2-97% (median 40%) relative to the best-performing granularity, and up to 338% on individual tasks. Strikingly, setting citation granularity to its optimal value (based on attribution quality) unlocks these substantial gains while leaving overall answer correctness essentially unchanged (between -2.3% and +4.4%). We observe a consistent pattern where attribution quality peaks at intermediate (paragraph-level) granularities: finer citations appear to sever the semantic dependencies needed to ground a claim, while excessively coarse citations introduce distracting noise. Importantly, this performance gap varies with scale: when a claim rests on a small or moderate amount of evidence, it disproportionately penalizes larger models by disrupting the multi-sentence information synthesis at which they excel. Fine-grained citation rests on the premise that a sentence is a sufficient unit of evidence on its own. Our results indicate that it often is not, and that this is a property of the model rather than of the citation standard. Standards fixed for human verifiability may therefore paradoxically degrade the very attribution they aim to ensure; effective attribution requires matching granularity to the model's semantic scope rather than fixing it by convention.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

34 of 39 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  2. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  4. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  5. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  6. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  7. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  8. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  9. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
  10. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  11. 2021Efficient Attentions for Long Document Summarizationcited by 342
  12. 2022Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verificationcited by 304
22 more
  1. 2022Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotescited by 290
  2. 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 285
  3. 2024Retrieval Head Mechanistically Explains Long-Context Factualitycited by 219
  4. 2022Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Modelscited by 108
  5. 2024LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMscited by 104
  6. 2024LongAlign: A Recipe for Long Context Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 102
  7. 2024LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-context QAcited by 78
  8. 2023Effective Large Language Model Adaptation for Improved Grounding and Citation Generationcited by 44
  9. 2024Improving Attributed Text Generation of Large Language Models via Preference Learningcited by 23
  10. 2024Mix-of-Granularity: Optimize the Chunking Granularity for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 23
  11. 2025More Documents, Same Length: Isolating the Challenge of Multiple Documents in RAGcited by 16
  12. 2024Verifiable Generation with Subsentence-Level Fine-Grained Citationscited by 15
  13. 2024ALiiCE: Evaluating Positional Fine-grained Citation Generationcited by 15
  14. 2024Verifiable by Design: Aligning Language Models to Quote from Pre-Training Datacited by 13
  15. 2026Sustainable Hybrid Document-Routed Retrieval for Financial RAG: Resolving the Robustness-Precision Trade-offcited by 13
  16. 2024CoTAR: Chain-of-Thought Attribution Reasoning with Multi-level Granularitycited by 12
  17. 2025A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 10
  18. 2025Hidden in the Haystack: Smaller Needles are More Difficult for LLMs to Findcited by 7
  19. 2025Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 7
  20. 2025Finding the Minimal Parameter Budget for Implicit Reasoning: A Data Complexity Driven Scaling Law for Language Modelscited by 3
  21. 2025Citation-Grounded Code Comprehension: Preventing LLM Hallucination Through Hybrid Retrieval and Graph-Augmented Contextcited by 2
  22. 2025Concise and Sufficient Sub-Sentence Citations for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.