ProgressGym: Alignment with a Millennium of Moral Progress
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frontier AI systems, including large language models (LLMs), hold increasing influence over the epistemology of human users. Such influence can reinforce prevailing societal values, potentially contributing to the lock-in of misguided moral beliefs and, consequently, the perpetuation of problematic moral practices on a broad scale. We introduce progress alignment as a technical solution to mitigate this imminent risk. Progress alignment algorithms learn to emulate the mechanics of human moral progress, thereby addressing the susceptibility of existing alignment methods to contemporary moral blindspots. To empower research in progress alignment, we introduce ProgressGym, an experimental framework allowing the learning of moral progress mechanics from history, in order to facilitate future progress in real-world moral decisions. Leveraging 9 centuries of historical text and 18 historical LLMs, ProgressGym enables codification of real-world progress alignment challenges into concrete benchmarks. Specifically, we introduce three core challenges: tracking evolving values (PG-Follow), preemptively anticipating moral progress (PG-Predict), and regulating the feedback loop between human and AI value shifts (PG-Coevolve). Alignment methods without a temporal dimension are inapplicable to these tasks. In response, we present lifelong and extrapolative algorithms as baseline methods of progress alignment, and build an open leaderboard soliciting novel algorithms and challenges. The framework and the leaderboard are available at https://github.com/PKU-Alignment/ProgressGym and https://huggingface.co/spaces/PKU-Alignment/ProgressGym-LeaderBoard respectively.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 125 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2024.
Builds on
52 of 125 references.
References · 52
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
38 more
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
- 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 275
- 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 256
- 2023TidyBot: Personalized Robot Assistance with Large Language Modelscited by 219
- 2023Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMscited by 211
- 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 193
- 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
- 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 174
- 2023The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Modelscited by 171
- 2023Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigationscited by 157
- 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 145
- 2023Training Language Models with Language Feedback at Scalecited by 125
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 120
- 2022Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Datasetcited by 113
- 2023Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Using Large Language Model-based Conversational Agents for Mental Well-being Supportcited by 75
- 2023NormBank: A Knowledge Bank of Situational Social Normscited by 60
- 2023Value FULCRA: Mapping Large Language Models to the Multidimensional Spectrum of Basic Human Valuescited by 49
- 2024Self-Alignment of Large Language Models via Monopolylogue-based Social Scene Simulationcited by 46
- 2023Generative Social Choicecited by 43
- 2024AI and the Problem of Knowledge Collapsecited by 34
- 2024Inverse-RLignment: Large Language Model Alignment from Demonstrations through Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2023The Moral Machine Experiment on Large Language Modelscited by 24
- 2023Align on the Fly: Adapting Chatbot Behavior to Established Normscited by 22
- 2023Creating a Large Language Model of a Philosophercited by 20
- 2024Towards Tracing Trustworthiness Dynamics: Revisiting Pre-training Period of Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2024Verifiable by Design: Aligning Language Models to Quote from Pre-Training Datacited by 13
- 2023Large Language Model Programscited by 11
- 2024Epistemology of Language Models: Do Language Models Have Holistic Knowledge?cited by 9
- 2018Image-based model parameter optimization using Model-Assisted Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 7
- 2023Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 7
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025Amulet: ReAlignment During Test Time for Personalized Preference Adaptation of LLMscited by 29
- 2025The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by Algorithmcited by 11
- 2025CLASH: Evaluating Language Models on Judging High-Stakes Dilemmas from Multiple Perspectivescited by 10
- 2026Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishingcited by 5
- 2025Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectivescited by 4
- 2025Super Co-alignment of Human and AI for Sustainable Symbiotic Societycited by 2
- 2025A Game-Theoretic Negotiation Framework for Cross-Cultural Consensus in LLMscited by 2
- 2026Adaptive Pluralistic Alignment: A pipeline for dynamic artificial democracycited by 2
- 2024Quantifying Risk Propensities of Large Language Models: Ethical Focus and Bias Detection through Role-Playcited by 1
- 2026Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing11 May 2026
- 2026Adaptive Pluralistic Alignment: A pipeline for dynamic artificial democracy2 May 2026
- 2025A Game-Theoretic Negotiation Framework for Cross-Cultural Consensus in LLMs16 Jun 2025
- 2025Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives11 Jun 2025
- 2025The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by Algorithm6 Jun 2025
- 2025Super Co-alignment of Human and AI for Sustainable Symbiotic Society24 Apr 2025
- 2025CLASH: Evaluating Language Models on Judging High-Stakes Dilemmas from Multiple Perspectives15 Apr 2025
- 2025Amulet: ReAlignment During Test Time for Personalized Preference Adaptation of LLMs26 Feb 2025
- 2024Quantifying Risk Propensities of Large Language Models: Ethical Focus and Bias Detection through Role-Play26 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Cultural Bias in Large Language Models: Evaluating AI Agents through Moral Questionnaires
- 2025Diverse Human Value Alignment for Large Language Models via Ethical Reasoning
- 2024A Moral Imperative: The Need for Continual Superalignment of Large Language Models
- 2025Normative Conflicts and Shallow AI Alignment
- 2026AI Value Alignment for Evolving Social Norms
- 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMs
- 2024The Moral Turing Test: Evaluating Human-LLM Alignment in Moral Decision-Making
- 2025The Morality of Probability: How Implicit Moral Biases in LLMs May Shape the Future of Human-AI Symbiosis