mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Knowledge Distillation-Based Model Extraction Attack using GAN-based Private Counterfactual Explanations

arXiv 2404.03348 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the deployment of machine learning (ML) models as services (MLaaS) across diverse production software applications. In parallel, explainable AI (XAI) continues to evolve, addressing the necessity for transparency and trustworthiness in ML models. XAI techniques aim to enhance the transparency of ML models by providing insights, in terms of model's explanations, into their decision-making process. Simultaneously, some MLaaS platforms now offer explanations alongside the ML prediction outputs. This setup has elevated concerns regarding vulnerabilities in MLaaS, particularly in relation to privacy leakage attacks such as model extraction attacks (MEA). This is due to the fact that explanations can unveil insights about the inner workings of the model which could be exploited by malicious users. In this work, we focus on investigating how model explanations, particularly counterfactual explanations (CFs), can be exploited for performing MEA within the MLaaS platform. We also delve into assessing the effectiveness of incorporating differential privacy (DP) as a mitigation strategy. To this end, we first propose a novel approach for MEA based on Knowledge Distillation (KD) to enhance the efficiency of extracting a substitute model of a target model exploiting CFs, without any knowledge about the training data distribution by the attacker. Then, we advise an approach for training CF generators incorporating DP to generate private CFs. We conduct thorough experimental evaluations on real-world datasets and demonstrate that our proposed KD-based MEA can yield a high-fidelity substitute model with a reduced number of queries with respect to baseline approaches. Furthermore, our findings reveal that including a privacy layer can allow mitigating the MEA. However, on the account of the quality of CFs, impacts the performance of the explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.

Builds on

32 of 55 references.

References · 32

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  5. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  6. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  7. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  8. 2019On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillationcited by 377
  9. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
  10. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  11. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  12. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
20 more
  1. 2019Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIscited by 136
  2. 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
  3. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 84
  4. 2022Variational Model Inversion Attackscited by 75
  5. 2020Model extraction from counterfactual explanationscited by 46
  6. 2019CERTIFAI: Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Interpretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence modelscited by 34
  7. 2022On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Recoursecited by 32
  8. 2022DualCF: Efficient Model Extraction Attack from Counterfactual Explanationscited by 31
  9. 2020Model Explanations with Differential Privacycited by 23
  10. 2019Explaining Deep Learning Models with Constrained Adversarial Examplescited by 19
  11. 2020PermuteAttack: Counterfactual Explanation of Machine Learning Credit Scorecardscited by 16
  12. 2022Differentially Private Counterfactuals via Functional Mechanismcited by 13
  13. 2020Ordered Counterfactual Explanation by Mixed-Integer Linear Optimizationcited by 11
  14. 2023Towards Bridging the Gaps between the Right to Explanation and the Right to be Forgottencited by 10
  15. 2021Counterfactual Explanation with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Drug Target Predictioncited by 8
  16. 2020Explaining Deep Graph Networks with Molecular Counterfactualscited by 6
  17. 2023Feasible Recourse Plan via Diverse Interpolationcited by 6
  18. 2024A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasurescited by 6
  19. 2023Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakagecited by 5
  20. 2023Privacy-Preserving Algorithmic Recoursecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.