mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage

arXiv 2308.04341 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models are increasingly utilized across impactful domains to predict individual outcomes. As such, many models provide algorithmic recourse to individuals who receive negative outcomes. However, recourse can be leveraged by adversaries to disclose private information. This work presents the first attempt at mitigating such attacks. We present two novel methods to generate differentially private recourse: Differentially Private Model (DPM) and Laplace Recourse (LR). Using logistic regression classifiers and real world and synthetic datasets, we find that DPM and LR perform well in reducing what an adversary can infer, especially at low FPR. When training dataset size is large enough, we find particular success in preventing privacy leakage while maintaining model and recourse accuracy with our novel LR method.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2023.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  4. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 84
  5. 2019Diffprivlib: The IBM Differential Privacy Librarycited by 51
  6. 2020Model extraction from counterfactual explanationscited by 46
  7. 2022On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Recoursecited by 32
  8. 2017Privacy Risk in Machine Learning: Analyzing the Connection to Overfittingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.