mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Feasible Recourse Plan via Diverse Interpolation

arXiv 2302.11213 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explaining algorithmic decisions and recommending actionable feedback is increasingly important for machine learning applications. Recently, significant efforts have been invested in finding a diverse set of recourses to cover the wide spectrum of users' preferences. However, existing works often neglect the requirement that the recourses should be close to the data manifold; hence, the constructed recourses might be implausible and unsatisfying to users. To address these issues, we propose a novel approach that explicitly directs the diverse set of actionable recourses towards the data manifold. We first find a diverse set of prototypes in the favorable class that balances the trade-off between diversity and proximity. We demonstrate two specific methods to find these prototypes: either by finding the maximum a posteriori estimate of a determinantal point process or by solving a quadratic binary program. To ensure the actionability constraints, we construct an actionability graph in which the nodes represent the training samples and the edges indicate the feasible action between two instances. We then find a feasible path to each prototype, and this path demonstrates the feasible actions for each recourse in the plan. The experimental results show that our method produces a set of recourses that are close to the data manifold while delivering a better cost-diversity trade-off than existing approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2023.

Builds on

25 of 50 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  3. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  4. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  5. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  6. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  7. 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
  8. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  9. 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
  10. 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 139
  11. 2019Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systemscited by 128
  12. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
13 more
  1. 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
  2. 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
  3. 2021CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithmscited by 85
  4. 2021Amortized Generation of Sequential Algorithmic Recourses for Black-box Modelscited by 24
  5. 2019Synthesizing Action Sequences for Modifying Model Decisionscited by 22
  6. 2014Learning the Parameters of Determinantal Point Process Kernelscited by 21
  7. 2022Counterfactual Plans under Distributional Ambiguitycited by 19
  8. 2019Multi-Document Summarization with Determinantal Point Processes and Contextualized Representationscited by 16
  9. 2021Directive Explanations for Actionable Explainability in Machine Learning Applicationscited by 14
  10. 2016Low-Rank Factorization of Determinantal Point Processes for Recommendationcited by 13
  11. 2020Explaining Predictions by Approximating the Local Decision Boundarycited by 7
  12. 2018Finding k-Dissimilar Paths with Minimum Collective Lengthcited by 4
  13. 2021Principal Component Hierarchy for Sparse Quadratic Programscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.