mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Intrinsic Image Decomposition with LiDAR Intensity Enhanced Training

arXiv 2403.14089 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised intrinsic image decomposition (IID) is the process of separating a natural image into albedo and shade without these ground truths. A recent model employing light detection and ranging (LiDAR) intensity demonstrated impressive performance, though the necessity of LiDAR intensity during inference restricts its practicality. Thus, IID models employing only a single image during inference while keeping as high IID quality as the one with an image plus LiDAR intensity are highly desired. To address this challenge, we propose a novel approach that utilizes only an image during inference while utilizing an image and LiDAR intensity during training. Specifically, we introduce a partially-shared model that accepts an image and LiDAR intensity individually using a different specific encoder but processes them together in specific components to learn shared representations. In addition, to enhance IID quality, we propose albedo-alignment loss and image-LiDAR conversion (ILC) paths. Albedo-alignment loss aligns the gray-scale albedo from an image to that inferred from LiDAR intensity, thereby reducing cast shadows in albedo from an image due to the absence of cast shadows in LiDAR intensity. Furthermore, to translate the input image into albedo and shade style while keeping the image contents, the input image is separated into style code and content code by encoders. The ILC path mutually translates the image and LiDAR intensity, which share content but differ in style, contributing to the distinct differentiation of style from content. Consequently, LIET achieves comparable IID quality to the existing model with LiDAR intensity, while utilizing only an image without LiDAR intensity during inference.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2024.

Builds on

39 of 71 references.

References · 39

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  4. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  5. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  6. 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 1,998
  7. 2021Image Super-Resolution via Iterative Refinementcited by 1,506
  8. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  9. 2017High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANscited by 1,176
  10. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  11. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
  12. 2018Multimodal Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translationcited by 795
27 more
  1. 2017Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networkscited by 602
  2. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 514
  3. 2020NeRV: Neural Reflectance and Visibility Fields for Relighting and View Synthesiscited by 493
  4. 2020NeRD: Neural Reflectance Decomposition from Image Collectionscited by 446
  5. 2021Extracting Triangular 3D Models, Materials, and Lighting From Imagescited by 363
  6. 2021PhySG: Inverse Rendering with Spherical Gaussians for Physics-based Material Editing and Relightingcited by 332
  7. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
  8. 2018Diverse Image-to-Image Translation via Disentangled Representationscited by 296
  9. 2017Photographic Image Synthesis with Cascaded Refinement Networkscited by 223
  10. 2022BBDM: Image-to-image Translation with Brownian Bridge Diffusion Modelscited by 222
  11. 2021Neural-PIL: Neural Pre-Integrated Lighting for Reflectance Decompositioncited by 204
  12. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  13. 2022Shape, Light, and Material Decomposition from Images using Monte Carlo Rendering and Denoisingcited by 163
  14. 2018InverseRenderNet: Learning single image inverse renderingcited by 100
  15. 2018CGIntrinsics: Better Intrinsic Image Decomposition through Physically-Based Renderingcited by 85
  16. 2018Learning Intrinsic Image Decomposition from Watching the Worldcited by 74
  17. 2019Unsupervised Learning for Intrinsic Image Decomposition from a Single Imagecited by 55
  18. 2023I2-SDF: Intrinsic Indoor Scene Reconstruction and Editing via Raytracing in Neural SDFscited by 42
  19. 2015Direct Intrinsics: Learning Albedo-Shading Decomposition by Convolutional Regressioncited by 32
  20. 2023General Image-to-Image Translation with One-Shot Image Guidancecited by 31
  21. 2018Joint Learning of Intrinsic Images and Semantic Segmentationcited by 26
  22. 2015Learning Data-driven Reflectance Priors for Intrinsic Image Decompositioncited by 24
  23. 2018Unsupervised Deep Single-Image Intrinsic Decomposition using Illumination-Varying Image Sequencescited by 22
  24. 2023MemorySeg: Online LiDAR Semantic Segmentation with a Latent Memorycited by 13
  25. 2021Deep Retinex Network for Estimating Illumination Colors with Self-Supervised Learningcited by 7
  26. 2021DeRenderNet: Intrinsic Image Decomposition of Urban Scenes with Shape-(In)dependent Shading Renderingcited by 6
  27. 2023Unsupervised Intrinsic Image Decomposition with LiDAR Intensitycited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.