mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Hierarchical Similarity Metric Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2111.00006 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Metric Learning (DML) plays a critical role in various machine learning tasks. However, most existing deep metric learning methods with binary similarity are sensitive to noisy labels, which are widely present in real-world data. Since these noisy labels often cause severe performance degradation, it is crucial to enhance the robustness and generalization ability of DML. In this paper, we propose an Adaptive Hierarchical Similarity Metric Learning method. It considers two noise-insensitive information, textiti.e., class-wise divergence and sample-wise consistency. Specifically, class-wise divergence can effectively excavate richer similarity information beyond binary in modeling by taking advantage of Hyperbolic metric learning, while sample-wise consistency can further improve the generalization ability of the model using contrastive augmentation. More importantly, we design an adaptive strategy to integrate this information in a unified view. It is noteworthy that the new method can be extended to any pair-based metric loss. Extensive experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance compared with current deep metric learning approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2021.

Builds on

49 of 76 references.

References · 49

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  9. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  10. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  11. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  12. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
37 more
  1. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
  2. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 684
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  7. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  8. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 422
  9. 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 403
  10. 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 402
  11. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  12. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  13. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  14. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  15. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  16. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 226
  17. 2019Hyperbolic Image Embeddingscited by 221
  18. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  19. 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
  20. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  21. 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
  22. 2018Poincar'e GloVe: Hyperbolic Word Embeddingscited by 156
  23. 2019Cross-Batch Memory for Embedding Learningcited by 132
  24. 2018Deep Metric Learning with Hierarchical Triplet Losscited by 112
  25. 2019Continuous Hierarchical Representations with Poincar'e Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 112
  26. 2017Deep Metric Learning with Angular Losscited by 107
  27. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  28. 2019AET vs. AED: Unsupervised Representation Learning by Auto-Encoding Transformations rather than Datacited by 77
  29. 2019Ranked List Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 77
  30. 2018Triplet-Center Loss for Multi-View 3D Object Retrievalcited by 69
  31. 2016Siamese Instance Search for Trackingcited by 60
  32. 2018Attention-based Ensemble for Deep Metric Learningcited by 56
  33. 2016Learning Deep Embeddings with Histogram Losscited by 52
  34. 2016Hard-Aware Deeply Cascaded Embeddingcited by 44
  35. 2020Fewer is More: A Deep Graph Metric Learning Perspective Using Fewer Proxiescited by 36
  36. 2018Hard-Aware Point-to-Set Deep Metric for Person Re-identificationcited by 12
  37. 2019Decomposition-Based Transfer Distance Metric Learning for Image Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

8 papers.