mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AraTrust: An Evaluation of Trustworthiness for LLMs in Arabic

arXiv 2403.09017 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The swift progress and widespread acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems highlight a pressing requirement to comprehend both the capabilities and potential risks associated with AI. Given the linguistic complexity, cultural richness, and underrepresented status of Arabic in AI research, there is a pressing need to focus on Large Language Models (LLMs) performance and safety for Arabic-related tasks. Despite some progress in their development, there is a lack of comprehensive trustworthiness evaluation benchmarks, which presents a major challenge in accurately assessing and improving the safety of LLMs when prompted in Arabic. In this paper, we introduce AraTrust, the first comprehensive trustworthiness benchmark for LLMs in Arabic. AraTrust comprises 522 human-written multiple-choice questions addressing diverse dimensions related to truthfulness, ethics, safety, physical health, mental health, unfairness, illegal activities, privacy, and offensive language. We evaluated a set of LLMs against our benchmark to assess their trustworthiness. GPT-4 was the most trustworthy LLM, while open-source models, particularly AceGPT 7B and Jais 13B, struggled to achieve a score of 60% in our benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2024.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
  7. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  8. 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
  9. 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 320
  10. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 213
  11. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 176
  12. 2023CValues: Measuring the Values of Chinese Large Language Models from Safety to Responsibilitycited by 80
6 more
  1. 2023AceGPT, Localizing Large Language Models in Arabiccited by 75
  2. 2022ORCA: A Challenging Benchmark for Arabic Language Understandingcited by 46
  3. 2023GPTAraEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Arabic NLPcited by 37
  4. 2023How Trustworthy are Open-Source LLMs? An Assessment under Malicious Demonstrations Shows their Vulnerabilitiescited by 33
  5. 2021SynthBio: A Case Study in Human-AI Collaborative Curation of Text Datasetscited by 18
  6. 2023SC-Safety: A Multi-round Open-ended Question Adversarial Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models in Chinesecited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: