From Guidelines to Practice: A New Paradigm for Arabic Language Model Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses critical gaps in Arabic language model evaluation by establishing comprehensive theoretical guidelines and introducing a novel evaluation framework. We first analyze existing Arabic evaluation datasets, identifying significant issues in linguistic accuracy, cultural alignment, and methodological rigor. To address these limitations in LLMs, we present the Arabic Depth Mini Dataset (ADMD), a carefully curated collection of 490 challenging questions spanning ten major domains (42 sub-domains, see Figure 1. Using ADMD, we evaluate five leading language models: GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini Flash 1.5, CommandR 100B, and Qwen-Max. Our results reveal significant variations in model performance across different domains, with particular challenges in areas requiring deep cultural understanding and specialized knowledge. Claude 3.5 Sonnet demonstrated the highest overall accuracy at 30%, showing relative strength in mathematical theory in Arabic, Arabic language, and islamic domains. This work provides both theoretical foundations and practical insights for improving Arabic language model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of cultural competence alongside technical capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2024Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontiercited by 129
- 2024ArabicMMLU: Assessing Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Arabiccited by 88
- 2025Fanar: An Arabic-Centric Multimodal Generative AI Platformcited by 67
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 60
- 2022ORCA: A Challenging Benchmark for Arabic Language Understandingcited by 47
- 2024AraDiCE: Benchmarks for Dialectal and Cultural Capabilities in LLMscited by 46
- 2023GPTAraEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Arabic NLPcited by 37
- 2025The Bitter Lesson Learned from 2,000+ Multilingual Benchmarkscited by 31
- 2024ArabicaQA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Arabic Question Answeringcited by 20
- 2024AraTrust: An Evaluation of Trustworthiness for LLMs in Arabiccited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 20253LM: Bridging Arabic, STEM, and Code through Benchmarkingcited by 5
- 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 4
- 2025From Words to Proverbs: Evaluating LLMs Linguistic and Cultural Competence in Saudi Dialects with Abshercited by 2
- 2025ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 2
- 2025Test Set Quality in Multilingual LLM Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025MATA: Mindful Assessment of the Telugu Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities6 Jan 2026
- 2025ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark1 Oct 2025
- 2025MATA: Mindful Assessment of the Telugu Abilities of Large Language Models19 Aug 2025
- 2025Test Set Quality in Multilingual LLM Evaluation4 Aug 2025
- 20253LM: Bridging Arabic, STEM, and Code through Benchmarking21 Jul 2025
- 2025From Words to Proverbs: Evaluating LLMs Linguistic and Cultural Competence in Saudi Dialects with Absher14 Jul 2025