mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CRiskEval: A Chinese Multi-Level Risk Evaluation Benchmark Dataset for Large Language Models

arXiv 2406.04752 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are possessed of numerous beneficial capabilities, yet their potential inclination harbors unpredictable risks that may materialize in the future. We hence propose CRiskEval, a Chinese dataset meticulously designed for gauging the risk proclivities inherent in LLMs such as resource acquisition and malicious coordination, as part of efforts for proactive preparedness. To curate CRiskEval, we define a new risk taxonomy with 7 types of frontier risks and 4 safety levels, including extremely hazardous,moderately hazardous, neutral and safe. We follow the philosophy of tendency evaluation to empirically measure the stated desire of LLMs via fine-grained multiple-choice question answering. The dataset consists of 14,888 questions that simulate scenarios related to predefined 7 types of frontier risks. Each question is accompanied with 4 answer choices that state opinions or behavioral tendencies corresponding to the question. All answer choices are manually annotated with one of the defined risk levels so that we can easily build a fine-grained frontier risk profile for each assessed LLM. Extensive evaluation with CRiskEval on a spectrum of prevalent Chinese LLMs has unveiled a striking revelation: most models exhibit risk tendencies of more than 40% (weighted tendency to the four risk levels). Furthermore, a subtle increase in the model's inclination toward urgent self-sustainability, power seeking and other dangerous goals becomes evident as the size of models increase. To promote further research on the frontier risk evaluation of LLMs, we publicly release our dataset at https://github.com/lingshi6565/Risk_eval.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.

Builds on

30 of 62 references.

References · 30

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  5. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  6. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  7. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  8. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
  9. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
  10. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  11. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 301
  12. 2024R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agentscited by 268
18 more
  1. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  2. 2022Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Modelscited by 209
  3. 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 176
  4. 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 174
  5. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
  6. 2024Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Surveycited by 124
  7. 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 101
  8. 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Taskscited by 94
  9. 2024Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systemscited by 63
  10. 2023SuperCLUE: A Comprehensive Chinese Large Language Model Benchmarkcited by 50
  11. 2023Evaluating Superhuman Models with Consistency Checkscited by 47
  12. 2023Artificial intelligence and biological misuse: Differentiating risks of language models and biological design toolscited by 43
  13. 2023Prompt Packer: Deceiving LLMs through Compositional Instruction with Hidden Attackscited by 30
  14. 2023Power-seeking can be probable and predictive for trained agentscited by 23
  15. 2024AraTrust: An Evaluation of Trustworthiness for LLMs in Arabiccited by 16
  16. 2024OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safetycited by 9
  17. 2024SELFI: Autonomous Self-Improvement with Reinforcement Learning for Social Navigationcited by 8
  18. 2023A Review of the Evidence for Existential Risk from AI via Misaligned Power-Seekingcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.