mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are you Struggling? Dataset and Baselines for Struggle Determination in Assembly Videos

arXiv 2402.11057 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2024cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Determining when people are struggling allows for a finer-grained understanding of actions that complements conventional action classification and error detection. Struggle detection, as defined in this paper, is a distinct and important task that can be identified without explicit step or activity knowledge. We introduce the first struggle dataset with three real-world problem-solving activities that are labelled by both expert and crowd-source annotators. Video segments were scored w.r.t. their level of struggle using a forced choice 4-point scale. This dataset contains 5.1 hours of video from 73 participants. We conducted a series of experiments to identify the most suitable modelling approaches for struggle determination. Additionally, we compared various deep learning models, establishing baseline results for struggle classification, struggle regression, and struggle label distribution learning. Our results indicate that struggle detection in video can achieve up to 88.24% accuracy in binary classification, while detecting the level of struggle in a four-way classification setting performs lower, with an overall accuracy of 52.45%. Our work is motivated toward a more comprehensive understanding of action in video and potentially the improvement of assistive systems that analyse struggle and can better support users during manual activities.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.

Builds on

53 of 78 references.

References · 53

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  6. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  7. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  8. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
  9. 2021Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Videocited by 1,556
  10. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
  11. 2023Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projectioncited by 1,402
  12. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
38 more
  1. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
  2. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  3. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  4. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  5. 2018Scaling Egocentric Vision: The EPIC-KITCHENS Datasetcited by 795
  6. 2020X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 637
  7. 2018Real-world Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videoscited by 577
  8. 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
  9. 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 519
  10. 2023Ego-Exo4D: Understanding Skilled Human Activity from First- and Third-Person Perspectivescited by 490
  11. 2020Multi-modal Transformer for Video Retrievalcited by 395
  12. 2017Future Frame Prediction for Anomaly Detection -- A New Baselinecited by 391
  13. 2021Pay Attention to MLPscited by 368
  14. 2019Video Classification with Channel-Separated Convolutional Networkscited by 290
  15. 2022Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activitiescited by 287
  16. 2021Video Transformer Networkcited by 272
  17. 2020FineGym: A Hierarchical Video Dataset for Fine-grained Action Understandingcited by 234
  18. 2021Weakly-supervised Video Anomaly Detection with Robust Temporal Feature Magnitude Learningcited by 230
  19. 2019Use What You Have: Video Retrieval Using Representations From Collaborative Expertscited by 214
  20. 2023HoloAssist: an Egocentric Human Interaction Dataset for Interactive AI Assistants in the Real Worldcited by 166
  21. 2022FineDiving: A Fine-grained Dataset for Procedure-aware Action Quality Assessmentcited by 107
  22. 2019What and How Well You Performed? A Multitask Learning Approach to Action Quality Assessmentcited by 100
  23. 2016Learning To Score Olympic Eventscited by 88
  24. 2018There Are Many Consistent Explanations of Unlabeled Data: Why You Should Averagecited by 82
  25. 2020Uncertainty-aware Score Distribution Learning for Action Quality Assessmentcited by 80
  26. 2018Action Quality Assessment Across Multiple Actionscited by 79
  27. 2020The MECCANO Dataset: Understanding Human-Object Interactions from Egocentric Videos in an Industrial-like Domaincited by 79
  28. 2017Action Tubelet Detector for Spatio-Temporal Action Localizationcited by 77
  29. 2018The Pros and Cons: Rank-aware Temporal Attention for Skill Determination in Long Videoscited by 69
  30. 2021Temporal Query Networks for Fine-grained Video Understandingcited by 68
  31. 2020SF-Net: Single-Frame Supervision for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 62
  32. 2021TubeR: Tubelet Transformer for Video Action Detectioncited by 55
  33. 2019Motion-Aware Feature for Improved Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 48
  34. 2022MECCANO: A Multimodal Egocentric Dataset for Humans Behavior Understanding in the Industrial-like Domaincited by 36
  35. 2019Manipulation-skill Assessment from Videos with Spatial Attention Networkcited by 29
  36. 2022Towards Open Set Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 26
  37. 2021Auto-Encoding Score Distribution Regression for Action Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  38. 2017Trespassing the Boundaries: Labeling Temporal Bounds for Object Interactions in Egocentric Videocited by 14

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.