mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trespassing the Boundaries: Labeling Temporal Bounds for Object Interactions in Egocentric Video

arXiv 1703.09026 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2017cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Manual annotations of temporal bounds for object interactions (i.e. start and end times) are typical training input to recognition, localization and detection algorithms. For three publicly available egocentric datasets, we uncover inconsistencies in ground truth temporal bounds within and across annotators and datasets. We systematically assess the robustness of state-of-the-art approaches to changes in labeled temporal bounds, for object interaction recognition. As boundaries are trespassed, a drop of up to 10% is observed for both Improved Dense Trajectories and Two-Stream Convolutional Neural Network. We demonstrate that such disagreement stems from a limited understanding of the distinct phases of an action, and propose annotating based on the Rubicon Boundaries, inspired by a similarly named cognitive model, for consistent temporal bounds of object interactions. Evaluated on a public dataset, we report a 4% increase in overall accuracy, and an increase in accuracy for 55% of classes when Rubicon Boundaries are used for temporal annotations.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: