Tuning the feedback controller gains is a simple way to improve autonomous driving performance
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Cooperative and V2X driving
Abstract (arXiv)
Typical autonomous driving systems are a combination of machine learning algorithms (often involving neural networks) and classical feedback controllers. Whilst significant progress has been made in recent years on the neural network side of these systems, only limited progress has been made on the feedback controller side. Often, the feedback control gains are simply passed from paper to paper with little re-tuning taking place, even though the changes to the neural networks can alter the vehicle's closed loop dynamics. The aim of this paper is to highlight the limitations of this approach; it is shown that re-tuning the feedback controller can be a simple way to improve autonomous driving performance. To demonstrate this, the PID gains of the longitudinal controller in the TCP autonomous vehicle algorithm are tuned. This causes the driving score in CARLA to increase from 73.21 to 77.38, with the results averaged over 16 driving scenarios. Moreover, it was observed that the performance benefits were most apparent during challenging driving scenarios, such as during rain or night time, as the tuned controller led to a more assertive driving style. These results demonstrate the value of developing both the neural network and feedback control policies of autonomous driving systems simultaneously, as this can be a simple and methodical way to improve autonomous driving system performance and robustness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Cooperative and V2X driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baselinecited by 247
- 2022Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformercited by 211
- 2021NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 174
- 2019Multimodal End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 110
- 2023ReasonNet: End-to-End Driving with Temporal and Global Reasoningcited by 92
- 2021Pylot: A Modular Platform for Exploring Latency-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 33
- 2022Bounding the difference between model predictive control and neural networkscited by 4
- 2023Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictionscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Automatic Parameter Tuning of Self-Driving Vehicles
- 2018An Auto-tuning Framework for Autonomous Vehicles
- 2024LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution Shifts
- 2021Weakly Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Highway Driving via Virtual Safety Cages
- 2023Rethinking Closed-loop Training for Autonomous Driving
- 2021Scalable Multiagent Driving Policies For Reducing Traffic Congestion
- 2023Eco-Driving Control of Connected and Automated Vehicles using Neural Network based Rollout
- 2025RoaD: Rollouts as Demonstrations for Closed-Loop Supervised Fine-Tuning of Autonomous Driving Policies