Bounding the difference between model predictive control and neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is a growing debate on whether the future of feedback control systems will be dominated by data-driven or model-driven approaches. Each of these two approaches has their own complimentary set of advantages and disadvantages, however, only limited attempts have, so far, been developed to bridge the gap between them. To address this issue, this paper introduces a method to bound the worst-case error between feedback control policies based upon model predictive control (MPC) and neural networks (NNs). This result is leveraged into an approach to automatically synthesize MPC policies minimising the worst-case error with respect to a NN. Numerical examples highlight the application of the bounds, with the goal of the paper being to encourage a more quantitative understanding of the relationship between data-driven and model-driven control.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Imitation Learning of MPC with Neural Networks: Error Guarantees and Sparsificationcited by 3
- 2024Mapping back and forth between model predictive control and neural networkscited by 1
- 2024Tuning the feedback controller gains is a simple way to improve autonomous driving performancecited by 0
- 2024Convex neural network synthesis for robustness in the 1-normcited by 0
- 2025Imitation Learning of MPC with Neural Networks: Error Guarantees and Sparsification7 Jan 2025
- 2024Convex neural network synthesis for robustness in the 1-norm29 May 2024
- 2024Mapping back and forth between model predictive control and neural networks18 Apr 2024
- 2024Tuning the feedback controller gains is a simple way to improve autonomous driving performance7 Feb 2024