mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Sentence Embeddings

arXiv 1906.01575 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2019cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models continuously break new records across different NLP tasks. At the same time, their success exposes weaknesses of model evaluation. Here, we compile several key pitfalls of evaluation of sentence embeddings, a currently very popular NLP paradigm. These pitfalls include the comparison of embeddings of different sizes, normalization of embeddings, and the low (and diverging) correlations between transfer and probing tasks. Our motivation is to challenge the current evaluation of sentence embeddings and to provide an easy-to-access reference for future research. Based on our insights, we also recommend better practices for better future evaluations of sentence embeddings.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

9 papers.