SlowPerception: Physical-World Latency Attack against Visual Perception in Autonomous Driving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous Driving (AD) systems critically depend on visual perception for real-time object detection and multiple object tracking (MOT) to ensure safe driving. However, high latency in these visual perception components can lead to significant safety risks, such as vehicle collisions. While previous research has extensively explored latency attacks within the digital realm, translating these methods effectively to the physical world presents challenges. For instance, existing attacks rely on perturbations that are unrealistic or impractical for AD, such as adversarial perturbations affecting areas like the sky, or requiring large patches that obscure most of a camera's view, thus making them impossible to be conducted effectively in the real world. In this paper, we introduce SlowPerception, the first physical-world latency attack against AD perception, via generating projector-based universal perturbations. SlowPerception strategically creates numerous phantom objects on various surfaces in the environment, significantly increasing the computational load of Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) and MOT, thereby inducing substantial latency. Our SlowPerception achieves second-level latency in physical-world settings, with an average latency of 2.5 seconds across different AD perception systems, scenarios, and hardware configurations. This performance significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art latency attacks. Additionally, we conduct AD system-level impact assessments, such as vehicle collisions, using industry-grade AD systems with production-grade AD simulators with a 97% average rate. We hope that our analyses can inspire further research in this critical domain, enhancing the robustness of AD systems against emerging vulnerabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.
Builds on
33 of 63 references.
References · 33
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2016Simple Online and Realtime Trackingcited by 862
- 2021ByteTrack: Multi-Object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Boxcited by 812
- 2016MOT16: A Benchmark for Multi-Object Trackingcited by 531
- 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2022Observation-Centric SORT: Rethinking SORT for Robust Multi-Object Trackingcited by 345
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
21 more
- 2014Multiple Object Tracking: A Literature Reviewcited by 165
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 151
- 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 119
- 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
- 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 100
- 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
- 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
- 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 63
- 2022T-SEA: Transfer-based Self-Ensemble Attack on Object Detectioncited by 59
- 2020SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial Perturbationscited by 50
- 2023An Adaptive Model Ensemble Adversarial Attack for Boosting Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 42
- 2023UCMCTrack: Multi-Object Tracking with Uniform Camera Motion Compensationcited by 42
- 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
- 2019Defending against Whitebox Adversarial Attacks via Randomized Discretizationcited by 29
- 2022Phantom Sponges: Exploiting Non-Maximum Suppression to Attack Deep Object Detectorscited by 28
- 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
- 2022SoK: On the Semantic AI Security in Autonomous Drivingcited by 22
- 2023TPatch: A Triggered Physical Adversarial Patchcited by 22
- 2023SlowTrack: Increasing the Latency of Camera-based Perception in Autonomous Driving Using Adversarial Examplescited by 15
- 2024Invisible Reflections: Leveraging Infrared Laser Reflections to Target Traffic Sign Perceptioncited by 14
- 2023Overload: Latency Attacks on Object Detection for Edge Devicescited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Efficiency Robustness of Dynamic Deep Learning Systemscited by 1
- 2026Real-Time Source-Free Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systemscited by 0
- 2026Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems20 Jul 2026
- 2026Real-Time Source-Free Object Detection30 Jun 2026
- 2025Efficiency Robustness of Dynamic Deep Learning Systems12 Jun 2025