mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Physical-World Adversarial Attack on Traffic Sign Recognition: A Commercial Systems Perspective

arXiv 2409.09860 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2024cs.CR cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traffic Sign Recognition (TSR) is crucial for safe and correct driving automation. Recent works revealed a general vulnerability of TSR models to physical-world adversarial attacks, which can be low-cost, highly deployable, and capable of causing severe attack effects such as hiding a critical traffic sign or spoofing a fake one. However, so far existing works generally only considered evaluating the attack effects on academic TSR models, leaving the impacts of such attacks on real-world commercial TSR systems largely unclear. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale measurement of physical-world adversarial attacks against commercial TSR systems. Our testing results reveal that it is possible for existing attack works from academia to have highly reliable (100%) attack success against certain commercial TSR system functionality, but such attack capabilities are not generalizable, leading to much lower-than-expected attack success rates overall. We find that one potential major factor is a spatial memorization design that commonly exists in today's commercial TSR systems. We design new attack success metrics that can mathematically model the impacts of such design on the TSR system-level attack success, and use them to revisit existing attacks. Through these efforts, we uncover 7 novel observations, some of which directly challenge the observations or claims in prior works due to the introduction of the new metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2024.

Builds on

37 of 82 references.

References · 37

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  9. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  10. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  11. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
  12. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
25 more
  1. 2021You Only Look at One Sequence: Rethinking Transformer in Vision through Object Detectioncited by 170
  2. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  3. 2018ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detectorcited by 159
  4. 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 151
  5. 2021Benchmarking Detection Transfer Learning with Vision Transformerscited by 130
  6. 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
  7. 2022Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural Phenomenoncited by 101
  8. 2019Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networkscited by 77
  9. 2021Adversarial Laser Beam: Effective Physical-World Attack to DNNs in a Blinkcited by 75
  10. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  11. 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
  12. 2019Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Video Recognition Modelscited by 58
  13. 2020SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial Perturbationscited by 50
  14. 2017NO Need to Worry about Adversarial Examples in Object Detection in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 48
  15. 2020Invisible Perturbations: Physical Adversarial Examples Exploiting the Rolling Shutter Effectcited by 40
  16. 2017Adversarial Examples that Fool Detectorscited by 39
  17. 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
  18. 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
  19. 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
  20. 2022SoK: On the Semantic AI Security in Autonomous Drivingcited by 22
  21. 2023TPatch: A Triggered Physical Adversarial Patchcited by 22
  22. 2021They See Me Rollin': Inherent Vulnerability of the Rolling Shutter in CMOS Image Sensorscited by 17
  23. 2023SlowTrack: Increasing the Latency of Camera-based Perception in Autonomous Driving Using Adversarial Examplescited by 15
  24. 2024Invisible Reflections: Leveraging Infrared Laser Reflections to Target Traffic Sign Perceptioncited by 14
  25. 2024ControlLoc: Physical-World Hijacking Attack on Visual Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.