Adversarial Calibration Attack on Autonomous Vehicles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) rely on accurate camera-LiDAR calibration for multimodal sensor fusion. In practice, calibration can drift due to vibration, temperature variation, or minor sensor displacement, motivating online calibration algorithms that detect and correct misalignment at runtime while allowing the vehicle to continue operating without a factory visit. Existing AV attacks largely assume correct calibration. We instead identify online sensor calibration as a new attack plane. A corrupted calibration update can persist across subsequent fusion operations, causing system-wide errors that propagate from perception to planning and control. We present Adversarial Calibration Attack (ACA), the first physical attack against camera-LiDAR online calibration. Using a single adversarial poster, ACA first spoofs the miscalibration detector to trigger the calibration process and then steers the calibration estimator toward an incorrect transformation. A unified optimization jointly designs the poster's geometry and texture for both objectives. We evaluate ACA across benchmark datasets, simulation, and physical experiments. On benchmark datasets such as KITTI and nuScenes, ACA induces up to 33.9 degrees mean rotational calibration error, thereby severely degrading object detection. In the CARLA simulator, the attack causes a collision when the corrupted calibration is accepted in vulnerable scenarios crafted by the attacker. On a real Husky robot, a printed adversarial poster successfully reproduces the calibration error. These results demonstrate that online calibration is a practical and safety-critical attack surface for AVs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
34 of 71 references.
References · 34
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
- 2019PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 449
- 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 152
- 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
- 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
- 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
- 2017RegNet: Multimodal Sensor Registration Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 69
- 2020Dirty Road Can Attack: Security of Deep Learning based Automated Lane Centering under Physical-World Attackcited by 64
- 2022Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patchescited by 57
- 2018DeepBillboard: Systematic Physical-World Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 50
- 2020SLAP: Improving Physical Adversarial Examples with Short-Lived Adversarial Perturbationscited by 50
- 2021Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Drivingcited by 45
22 more
- 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
- 2024Physical 3D Adversarial Attacks against Monocular Depth Estimation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 32
- 2022Fooling the Eyes of Autonomous Vehicles: Robust Physical Adversarial Examples Against Traffic Sign Recognition Systemscited by 27
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
- 2020Drift with Devil: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Localization in High-Level Autonomous Driving under GPS Spoofing (Extended Version)cited by 25
- 2023Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attackscited by 17
- 2022Rolling Colors: Adversarial Laser Exploits against Traffic Light Recognitioncited by 15
- 2024Invisible Reflections: Leveraging Infrared Laser Reflections to Target Traffic Sign Perceptioncited by 14
- 2023Fusion is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2023On Data Fabrication in Collaborative Vehicular Perception: Attacks and Countermeasurescited by 11
- 2023LiDAR Spoofing Meets the New-Gen: Capability Improvements, Broken Assumptions, and New Attack Strategiescited by 9
- 2021Temporal Consistency Checks to Detect LiDAR Spoofing Attacks on Autonomous Vehicle Perceptioncited by 8
- 2023ADoPT: LiDAR Spoofing Attack Detection Based on Point-Level Temporal Consistencycited by 6
- 2024Revisiting Physical-World Adversarial Attack on Traffic Sign Recognition: A Commercial Systems Perspectivecited by 6
- 2022Using 3D Shadows to Detect Object Hiding Attacks on Autonomous Vehicle Perceptioncited by 5
- 2024Invisible Optical Adversarial Stripes on Traffic Sign against Autonomous Vehiclescited by 5
- 2021Detecting and Identifying Optical Signal Attacks on Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 4
- 2025Asymmetry Vulnerability and Physical Attacks on Online Map Construction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 4
- 2023Exorcising ''Wraith'': Protecting LiDAR-based Object Detector in Automated Driving System from Appearing Attackscited by 3
- 2024PhantomLiDAR: Cross-modality Signal Injection Attacks against LiDARcited by 3
- 2025Cal or No Cal? -- Real-Time Miscalibration Detection of LiDAR and Camera Sensorscited by 2
- 2024Iterative Camera-LiDAR Extrinsic Optimization via Surrogate Diffusioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.