LARP: Learner-Agnostic Robust Data Prefiltering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Public datasets, crucial for modern machine learning and statistical inference, often contain low-quality or contaminated samples that can harm model performance. This creates a need for principled prefiltering procedures that a data provider can apply to protect the accuracy of a range of potential downstream statistical and learning procedures simultaneously. In this work, we formalize and analyze Learner-Agnostic Robust data Prefiltering (LARP), the problem of designing prefiltering procedures with guarantees on the worst-case loss over a pre-specified set of learners. We establish the feasibility of LARP in two theoretical settings, by providing upper-bound guarantees on the worst-case loss. Our theoretical results indicate that protecting heterogeneous learner sets via LARP comes at the price of some performance loss compared to individual, learner-specific prefiltering; we call this gap the price of LARP. To assess this gap in performance, we empirically measure the price of LARP across image and tabular tasks. We further explore potential benefits of LARP from the perspective of saving on repeated data curation efforts, in a game-theoretic model where the downstream learners can split the cost of the single prefiltering.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.
Builds on
47 of 81 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
35 more
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
- 2016Robust Estimators in High Dimensions without the Computational Intractabilitycited by 209
- 2023Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 202
- 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
- 2018Sever: A Robust Meta-Algorithm for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 123
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
- 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 93
- 2021What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpuscited by 79
- 2023LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithmscited by 69
- 2017Adaptive Huber Regressioncited by 59
- 2020Robust regression with covariate filtering: Heavy tails and adversarial contaminationcited by 49
- 2022On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributionscited by 39
- 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 39
- 2023Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling Accuracycited by 20
- 2023Fine-Tuning Games: Bargaining and Adaptation for General-Purpose Modelscited by 17
- 2023Delegated Classificationcited by 10
- 2023Delegating Data Collection in Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2017Efficient PAC Learning from the Crowdcited by 7
- 2023Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Frameworkcited by 3
- 2023Online Robust Mean Estimationcited by 3
- 2022Mathematical Framework for Online Social Media Auditingcited by 1
- 2025Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasetscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.