mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometric Median Matching for Robust k-Subset Selection from Noisy Data

arXiv 2504.00564 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data pruning -- the combinatorial task of selecting a small and representative subset from a large dataset, is crucial for mitigating the enormous computational costs associated with training data-hungry modern deep learning models at scale. Since large scale data collections are invariably noisy, developing data pruning strategies that remain robust even in the presence of corruption is critical in practice. However, existing data pruning methods often fail under high corruption rates due to their reliance on empirical mean estimation, which is highly sensitive to outliers. In response, we propose Geometric Median (GM) Matching, a novel k-subset selection strategy that leverages Geometric Median -- a robust estimator with an optimal breakdown point of 1/2; to enhance resilience against noisy data. Our method iteratively selects a k-subset such that the mean of the subset approximates the GM of the (potentially) noisy dataset, ensuring robustness even under arbitrary corruption. We provide theoretical guarantees, showing that GM Matching enjoys an improved O(1/k) convergence rate -- a quadratic improvement over random sampling, even under arbitrary corruption. Extensive experiments across image classification and image generation tasks demonstrate that GM Matching consistently outperforms existing pruning approaches, particularly in high-corruption settings and at high pruning rates; making it a strong baseline for robust data pruning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.

Builds on

47 of 92 references.

References · 47

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  6. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  7. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  8. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  9. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  10. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  11. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  12. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
35 more
  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
  7. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  8. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  9. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  10. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  11. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  12. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  13. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  14. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
  15. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  16. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  17. 2016Robust Estimators in High Dimensions without the Computational Intractabilitycited by 209
  18. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 153
  19. 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 148
  20. 2022On The Computational Complexity of Self-Attentioncited by 137
  21. 2013Stochastic Gradient Descent, Weighted Sampling, and the Randomized Kaczmarz algorithmcited by 132
  22. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
  23. 2021Vision Transformer for Small-Size Datasetscited by 122
  24. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  25. 2019Recent Advances in Algorithmic High-Dimensional Robust Statisticscited by 100
  26. 2019Federated Variance-Reduced Stochastic Gradient Descent with Robustness to Byzantine Attackscited by 79
  27. 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
  28. 2016Geometric Median in Nearly Linear Timecited by 38
  29. 2021Generalized Kernel Thinningcited by 29
  30. 2020Choosing the Sample with Lowest Loss makes SGD Robustcited by 26
  31. 2023Data-Efficient Contrastive Self-supervised Learning: Most Beneficial Examples for Supervised Learning Contribute the Leastcited by 22
  32. 2021Robust Training in High Dimensions via Block Coordinate Geometric Median Descentcited by 20
  33. 2023Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling Accuracycited by 20
  34. 2020Robust subset selectioncited by 2
  35. 2025Pareto Optimization with Robust Evaluation for Noisy Subset Selectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.