On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made its way into various scientific fields, providing astonishing improvements over existing algorithms for a wide variety of tasks. In recent years, there have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies. The scientific community has focused on the development of trustworthy AI algorithms. However, machine and deep learning algorithms, popular in the AI community today, depend heavily on the data used during their development. These learning algorithms identify patterns in the data, learning the behavioral objective. Any flaws in the data have the potential to translate directly into algorithms. In this study, we discuss the importance of Responsible Machine Learning Datasets and propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric. While existing work focuses on the post-hoc evaluation of algorithms for their trustworthiness, we provide a framework that considers the data component separately to understand its role in the algorithm. We discuss responsible datasets through the lens of fairness, privacy, and regulatory compliance and provide recommendations for constructing future datasets. After surveying over 100 datasets, we use 60 datasets for analysis and demonstrate that none of these datasets is immune to issues of fairness, privacy preservation, and regulatory compliance. We provide modifications to the ``datasheets for datasets" with important additions for improved dataset documentation. With governments around the world regularizing data protection laws, the method for the creation of datasets in the scientific community requires revision. We believe this study is timely and relevant in today's era of AI.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 143 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.
Builds on
50 of 143 references.
References · 50
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
- 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
- 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 451
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2019PadChest: A large chest x-ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reportscited by 308
- 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
38 more
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
- 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
- 2019Does Object Recognition Work for Everyone?cited by 149
- 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
- 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
- 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
- 2019Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learningcited by 116
- 2023DCFace: Synthetic Face Generation with Dual Condition Diffusion Modelcited by 116
- 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
- 2016Regressing Robust and Discriminative 3D Morphable Models with a very Deep Neural Networkcited by 109
- 2021SynFace: Face Recognition with Synthetic Datacited by 106
- 2017Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Imagescited by 101
- 2020COVID-19 Image Data Collection: Prospective Predictions Are the Futurecited by 100
- 2015A Deeper Look at Dataset Biascited by 86
- 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
- 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
- 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
- 2020BIMCV COVID-19+: a large annotated dataset of RX and CT images from COVID-19 patientscited by 81
- 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Datasetcited by 80
- 2018The Devil of Face Recognition is in the Noisecited by 65
- 2022Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 53
- 2019AnonymousNet: Natural Face De-Identification with Measurable Privacycited by 50
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
- 2023GANDiffFace: Controllable Generation of Synthetic Datasets for Face Recognition with Realistic Variationscited by 49
- 2020MAAD-Face: A Massively Annotated Attribute Dataset for Face Imagescited by 31
- 2022Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desideratacited by 28
- 2017Connecting Pixels to Privacy and Utility: Automatic Redaction of Private Information in Imagescited by 24
- 2020Data Minimization for GDPR Compliance in Machine Learning Modelscited by 21
- 2018Privacy-preserving Machine Learning through Data Obfuscationcited by 18
- 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
- 2022You Only Need a Good Embeddings Extractor to Fix Spurious Correlationscited by 17
- 2013Patch-based Probabilistic Image Quality Assessment for Face Selection and Improved Video-based Face Recognitioncited by 13
- 2017AFIF4: Deep Gender Classification based on AdaBoost-based Fusion of Isolated Facial Features and Foggy Facescited by 11
- 2016Large age-gap face verification by feature injection in deep networkscited by 10
- 2018Anonymizing k-Facial Attributes via Adversarial Perturbationscited by 8
- 2021Sejong Face Database: A Multi-Modal Disguise Face Databasecited by 7
- 2022Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysiscited by 6
- 2020Subclass Contrastive Loss for Injured Face Recognitioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.