mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learning

arXiv 1912.10389 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2019cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 116

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A growing body of work shows that many problems in fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in machine learning systems are rooted in decisions surrounding the data collection and annotation process. In spite of its fundamental nature however, data collection remains an overlooked part of the machine learning (ML) pipeline. In this paper, we argue that a new specialization should be formed within ML that is focused on methodologies for data collection and annotation: efforts that require institutional frameworks and procedures. Specifically for sociocultural data, parallels can be drawn from archives and libraries. Archives are the longest standing communal effort to gather human information and archive scholars have already developed the language and procedures to address and discuss many challenges pertaining to data collection such as consent, power, inclusivity, transparency, and ethics & privacy. We discuss these five key approaches in document collection practices in archives that can inform data collection in sociocultural ML. By showing data collection practices from another field, we encourage ML research to be more cognizant and systematic in data collection and draw from interdisciplinary expertise.

Key facts. Cited by 116 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 24; 2022: 31; 2023: 15; 2024: 25; 2025: 15; 2026: 6.

116 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
  2. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  3. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
  4. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  5. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
  6. 2022Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLPcited by 218
  7. 2021RedCaps: web-curated image-text data created by the people, for the peoplecited by 180
  8. 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 137
  9. 2022Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Modelscited by 118
  10. 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
  11. 2022A Prompt Array Keeps the Bias Away: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Adversarial Learningcited by 104
  12. 2021Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detectioncited by 96
38 more
  1. 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
  2. 2021What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpuscited by 80
  3. 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
  4. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  5. 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
  6. 2024Fairness Feedback Loops: Training on Synthetic Data Amplifies Biascited by 55
  7. 2023Identifying and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in LLM-Integrated Applicationscited by 54
  8. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 53
  9. 2021Changing the World by Changing the Datacited by 51
  10. 2023GeoDE: a Geographically Diverse Evaluation Dataset for Object Recognitioncited by 50
  11. 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
  12. 2022Handling and Presenting Harmful Text in NLP Researchcited by 43
  13. 2022The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanationscited by 41
  14. 2022Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasetscited by 38
  15. 2022Measuring Representational Harms in Image Captioningcited by 36
  16. 2025Position: Model Collapse Does Not Mean What You Thinkcited by 33
  17. 2023Overwriting Pretrained Bias with Finetuning Datacited by 32
  18. 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Datacited by 31
  19. 2021Should We Be Pre-training? An Argument for End-task Aware Training as an Alternativecited by 26
  20. 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 25
  21. 2021Adaptive Sampling for Minimax Fair Classificationcited by 24
  22. 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
  23. 2021When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inferencecited by 22
  24. 2022Listening to Affected Communities to Define Extreme Speech: Dataset and Experimentscited by 22
  25. 2022Men Also Do Laundry: Multi-Attribute Bias Amplificationcited by 21
  26. 2024Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecuritycited by 21
  27. 2024Fairness and Bias in Multimodal AI: A Surveycited by 20
  28. 2021Corpus-Level Evaluation for Event QA: The IndiaPoliceEvents Corpus Covering the 2002 Gujarat Violencecited by 19
  29. 2022Measuring Datacited by 18
  30. 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
  31. 2022The worst of both worlds: A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and machine learningcited by 17
  32. 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
  33. 2022Near Perfect GAN Inversioncited by 15
  34. 2024Who's in and who's out? A case study of multimodal CLIP-filtering in DataCompcited by 15
  35. 2021Computer Vision and Conflicting Values: Describing People with Automated Alt Textcited by 14
  36. 2022Robots Enact Malignant Stereotypescited by 14
  37. 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 14
  38. 2022MMD-B-Fair: Learning Fair Representations with Statistical Testingcited by 13

50 most cited of 116 All 116 (JSON)