mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness-enhanced Uplift Modeling with Adversarial Feature Desensitization

arXiv 2310.04693 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uplift modeling has shown very promising results in online marketing. However, most existing works are prone to the robustness challenge in some practical applications. In this paper, we first present a possible explanation for the above phenomenon. We verify that there is a feature sensitivity problem in online marketing using different real-world datasets, where the perturbation of some key features will seriously affect the performance of the uplift model and even cause the opposite trend. To solve the above problem, we propose a novel robustness-enhanced uplift modeling framework with adversarial feature desensitization (RUAD). Specifically, our RUAD can more effectively alleviate the feature sensitivity of the uplift model through two customized modules, including a feature selection module with joint multi-label modeling to identify a key subset from the input features and an adversarial feature desensitization module using adversarial training and soft interpolation operations to enhance the robustness of the model against this selected subset of features. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on a public dataset and a real product dataset to verify the effectiveness of our RUAD in online marketing. In addition, we also demonstrate the robustness of our RUAD to the feature sensitivity, as well as the compatibility with different uplift models.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2023.

Builds on

24 of 44 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  5. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  6. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  7. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
  8. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  9. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
  10. 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 328
  11. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
  12. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
12 more
  1. 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
  2. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  3. 2022Causality Inspired Representation Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 136
  4. 2021Feature Importance-aware Transferable Adversarial Attackscited by 125
  5. 2019Defense Against Adversarial Attacks Using Feature Scattering-based Adversarial Trainingcited by 95
  6. 2020Identifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware Modelscited by 57
  7. 2017Uplift Modeling with Multiple Treatments and General Response Typescited by 41
  8. 2020A unified survey of treatment effect heterogeneity modeling and uplift modelingcited by 36
  9. 2023Explicit Feature Interaction-aware Uplift Network for Online Marketingcited by 25
  10. 2023Optimizing Feature Set for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 13
  11. 2017Training Ensembles to Detect Adversarial Examplescited by 10
  12. 2019Qini-based Uplift Regressioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.