mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Autonomous Agents in a Cyber Defence Environment

arXiv 2309.07388 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2023cs.CRcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous Cyber Defence is required to respond to high-tempo cyber-attacks. To facilitate the research in this challenging area, we explore the utility of the autonomous cyber operation environments presented as part of the Cyber Autonomy Gym for Experimentation (CAGE) Challenges, with a specific focus on CAGE Challenge 2. CAGE Challenge 2 required a defensive Blue agent to defend a network from an attacking Red agent. We provide a detailed description of the this challenge and describe the approaches taken by challenge participants. From the submitted agents, we identify four classes of algorithms, namely, Single- Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), Hierarchical DRL, Ensembles, and Non-DRL approaches. Of these classes, we found that the hierarchical DRL approach was the most capable of learning an effective cyber defensive strategy. Our analysis of the agent policies identified that different algorithms within the same class produced diverse strategies and that the strategy used by the defensive Blue agent varied depending on the strategy used by the offensive Red agent. We conclude that DRL algorithms are a suitable candidate for autonomous cyber defence applications.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 8; 2026: 9.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Optimal Defender Strategies for CAGE-2 using Causal Modeling and Tree Searchcited by 12
  2. 2024CybORG++: An Enhanced Gym for the Development of Autonomous Cyber Agentscited by 11
  3. 2024Adversarial Inception Backdoor Attacks against Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  4. 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defence: A Surveycited by 6
  5. 2024Designing Robust Cyber-Defense Agents with Evolving Behavior Treescited by 4
  6. 2024Out-of-Distribution Detection for Neurosymbolic Autonomous Cyber Agentscited by 3
  7. 2025Large Language Model Integration with Reinforcement Learning to Augment Decision-Making in Autonomous Cyber Operationscited by 3
  8. 2025Learning Optimal Defender Strategies for CAGE-2 using a POMDP Modelcited by 3
  9. 2026Beyond Rewards in Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Defencecited by 3
  10. 2026Building Better Environments for Autonomous Cyber Defencecited by 3
  11. 2025Learning to Communicate in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defencecited by 2
  12. 2026ACDZero: MCTS Agent for Mastering Automated Cyber Defensecited by 2
12 more
  1. 2025Quantitative Resilience Modeling for Autonomous Cyber Defensecited by 1
  2. 2025Less is more? Rewards in RL for Cyber Defencecited by 1
  3. 2025Interpreting Agent Behaviors in Reinforcement-Learning-Based Cyber-Battle Simulation Platformscited by 1
  4. 2025General Autonomous Cybersecurity Defense: Learning Robust Policies for Dynamic Topologies and Diverse Attackerscited by 1
  5. 2026Context, Reasoning, and Hierarchy: A Cost-Performance Study of Compound LLM Agent Design in an Adversarial POMDPcited by 1
  6. 2026FORGE: Self-Evolving Agent Memory With No Weight Updates via Population Broadcastcited by 1
  7. 2024Explore Reinforced: Equilibrium Approximation with Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  8. 2025PoolFlip: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Security Environment for Cyber Defensecited by 0
  9. 2026Design Principles for the Construction of a Benchmark Evaluating Security Operation Capabilities of Multi-agent AI Systemscited by 0
  10. 2026Learning Red Agent Policy from Observations for Neurosymbolic Autonomous Cyber Agentscited by 0
  11. 2026Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models into Lightweight Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Cyber Operationscited by 0
  12. 2026Towards Hierarchical Cyber Defense with Large Language Models: From Planning to Executioncited by 0