mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ACDZero: MCTS Agent for Mastering Automated Cyber Defense

arXiv 2601.02196 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated cyber defense (ACD) seeks to protect computer networks with minimal or no human intervention, reacting to intrusions by taking corrective actions such as isolating hosts, resetting services, deploying decoys, or updating access controls. However, existing approaches for ACD, such as deep reinforcement learning (RL), often face difficult exploration in complex networks with large decision/state spaces and thus require an expensive amount of samples. Inspired by the need to learn sample-efficient defense policies, we frame ACD in CAGE Challenge 4 (CAGE-4 / CC4) as a context-based partially observable Markov decision problem and propose a planning-centric defense policy based on Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). It explicitly models the exploration-exploitation tradeoff in ACD and uses statistical sampling to guide exploration and decision making. We make novel use of graph neural networks (GNNs) to embed observations from the network as attributed graphs, to enable permutation-invariant reasoning over hosts and their relationships. To make our solution practical in complex search spaces, we guide MCTS with learned graph embeddings and priors over graph-edit actions, combining model-free generalization and policy distillation with look-ahead planning. We evaluate the resulting agent on CC4 scenarios involving diverse network structures and adversary behaviors, and show that our search-guided, graph-embedding-based planning improves defense reward and robustness relative to state-of-the-art RL baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.

Builds on

18 of 37 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  3. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
  4. 2021Monte Carlo Tree Search: A Review of Recent Modifications and Applicationscited by 158
  5. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Securitycited by 92
  6. 2020Finding Effective Security Strategies through Reinforcement Learning and Self-Playcited by 32
  7. 2023SwinGNN: Rethinking Permutation Invariance in Diffusion Models for Graph Generationcited by 26
  8. 2023On Autonomous Agents in a Cyber Defence Environmentcited by 24
  9. 2023Automated Cyber Defence: A Reviewcited by 19
  10. 2025InSPO: Unlocking Intrinsic Self-Reflection for LLM Preference Optimizationcited by 11
  11. 2023A Multiagent CyberBattleSim for RL Cyber Operation Agentscited by 8
  12. 2023Representation Matters for Mastering Chess: Improved Feature Representation in AlphaZero Outperforms Switching to Transformerscited by 8
6 more
  1. 2025A Neurosymbolic Framework for Interpretable Cognitive Attack Detection in Augmented Realitycited by 8
  2. 2025Automated Cyber Defense with Generalizable Graph-based Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 6
  3. 2025MALinZero: Efficient Low-Dimensional Search for Mastering Complex Multi-Agent Planningcited by 5
  4. 2024Mixed Text Recognition with Efficient Parameter Fine-Tuning and Transformercited by 4
  5. 2025Perception Graph for Cognitive Attack Reasoning in Augmented Realitycited by 4
  6. 2025Calibrating and Rotating: A Unified Framework for Weight Conditioning in PEFTcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.