FORGE: Self-Evolving Agent Memory With No Weight Updates via Population Broadcast
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Can LLM agents improve decision-making through self-generated memory without gradient updates? We propose FORGE (Failure-Optimized Reflective Graduation and Evolution), a staged, population-based protocol that evolves prompt-injected natural-language memory for hierarchical ReAct agents. FORGE wraps a Reflexion-style inner loop, where a dedicated reflection agent (using the same underlying LLM, no distillation from a stronger model) converts failed trajectories into reusable knowledge artifacts: textual heuristics (Rules), few-shot demonstrations (Examples), or both (Mixed), with an outer loop that propagates the best-performing instance's memory to the population between stages and freezes converged instances via a graduation criterion. We evaluate on CybORG CAGE-2, a stochastic network-defense POMDP at a 30-step horizon against the B-line attacker, where all four tested LLM families (Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite, Grok-4-Fast, Llama-4-Maverick, Qwen3-235B) exhibit strongly negative, heavy-tailed zero-shot rewards. Compared against both a zero-shot baseline and a Reflexion baseline (isolated single-stream learning), FORGE improves average evaluation return by 1.7-7.7× over zero-shot and by 29-72% over Reflexion in all 12 model-representation conditions, reducing major-failure rates (below -100) to as low as ~1%. We find that (1) population broadcast is critical mechanism, with a no-graduation ablation confirming that broadcast carries the performance gains while graduation primarily saves compute; (2) Examples achieves the strongest returns for three of four models, Rules offers the best cost-reliability profile with ~40% fewer tokens; and (3) weaker baseline models benefit disproportionately, suggesting FORGE may mitigate capability gaps rather than amplify strong models. All evidence is confined to CAGE-2 B-line; cross-family findings are directional evidence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 27 references.
References · 15
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 431
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 367
- 2025Dynamic Cheatsheet: Test-Time Learning with Adaptive Memorycited by 163
- 2024AutoGuide: Automated Generation and Selection of Context-Aware Guidelines for Large Language Model Agentscited by 74
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MemSkill: Learning and Evolving Memory Skills for Self-Evolving Agents
- 2025MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory Systems
- 2026Learning What to Remember and What to Internalize in LLM Self-Evolution via Adaptive Memory-Parameter Coordination
- 2026Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Decentralized Memory
- 2026AEL: Evolving Agent Harness in Open-Ended Environments
- 2026Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging Frontiers
- 2026OPD-Evolver: Cultivating Holistic Agent Evolver via On-Policy Distillation
- 2025Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory