mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Design Principles for the Construction of a Benchmark Evaluating Security Operation Capabilities of Multi-agent AI Systems

arXiv 2603.28998 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-agent AI systems are demonstrating increasing potential in cybersecurity operations, organizations, policymakers, model providers, and researchers in the AI and cybersecurity communities are interested in quantifying the capabilities of such AI systems to achieve more autonomous SOCs (security operation centers) and reduce manual effort. In particular, the AI and cybersecurity communities have recently developed several benchmarks for evaluating the red team capabilities of multi-agent AI systems. However, because the operations in SOCs are dominated by blue team operations, the capabilities of AI systems & agents to achieve more autonomous SOCs cannot be evaluated without a benchmark focused on blue team operations. To our best knowledge, no systematic benchmark for evaluating coordinated multi-task blue team AI has been proposed in the literature. Existing blue team benchmarks focus on a particular task. The goal of this work is to develop a set of design principles for the construction of a benchmark, which is denoted as SOC-bench, to evaluate the blue team capabilities of AI. Following these design principles, we have developed a conceptual design of SOC-bench, which consists of a family of five blue team tasks in the context of large-scale ransomware attack incident response.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems21 May
  2. 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities21 Mar

Other references · 4

  1. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 164
  2. 2025CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scalecited by 78
  3. 2023On Autonomous Agents in a Cyber Defence Environmentcited by 26
  4. 2025Revealing the True Indicators: Understanding and Improving IoC Extraction From Threat Reportscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Benchmarking LLMs in an Embodied Environment for Blue Team Threat Hunting
  2. 2025Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Hunting
  3. 2025Cybersecurity AI Benchmark (CAIBench): A Meta-Benchmark for Evaluating Cybersecurity AI Agents
  4. 2026RIFT-Bench: Dynamic Red-teaming For Agentic AI Systems
  5. 2025Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition
  6. 2025SoK: Measuring What Matters for Closed-Loop Security Agents
  7. 2026A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems
  8. 2025Reliable agent engineering should integrate machine-compatible organizational principles