Inferring Spatial Uncertainty in Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The availability of real-world datasets is the prerequisite for developing object detection methods for autonomous driving. While ambiguity exists in object labels due to error-prone annotation process or sensor observation noises, current object detection datasets only provide deterministic annotations without considering their uncertainty. This precludes an in-depth evaluation among different object detection methods, especially for those that explicitly model predictive probability. In this work, we propose a generative model to estimate bounding box label uncertainties from LiDAR point clouds, and define a new representation of the probabilistic bounding box through spatial distribution. Comprehensive experiments show that the proposed model represents uncertainties commonly seen in driving scenarios. Based on the spatial distribution, we further propose an extension of IoU, called the Jaccard IoU (JIoU), as a new evaluation metric that incorporates label uncertainty. Experiments on the KITTI and the Waymo Open Datasets show that JIoU is superior to IoU when evaluating probabilistic object detectors.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Semantics for Robotic Mapping, Perception and Interaction: A Surveycited by 56
- 2021Uncertainty for Identifying Open-Set Errors in Visual Object Detectioncited by 26
- 2022GLENet: Boosting 3D Object Detectors with Generative Label Uncertainty Estimationcited by 24
- 2021Gaussian Bounding Boxes and Probabilistic Intersection-over-Union for Object Detectioncited by 17
- 2023Generating Evidential BEV Maps in Continuous Driving Spacecited by 10
- 2021A Review of Testing Object-Based Environment Perception for Safe Automated Drivingcited by 9
- 2022Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perceptioncited by 7
- 2022Multi-Agent Active Search using Detection and Location Uncertaintycited by 1
- 2023Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Drivingcited by 0
- 2026Sarus: Privacy-Preserving Multi-Vendor Perception Fusion via Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 0
- 2026Sarus: Privacy-Preserving Multi-Vendor Perception Fusion via Homomorphic Encryption21 Jul 2026
- 2023Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Driving14 Aug 2023
- 2023Generating Evidential BEV Maps in Continuous Driving Space6 Feb 2023
- 2022GLENet: Boosting 3D Object Detectors with Generative Label Uncertainty Estimation6 Jul 2022
- 2022Multi-Agent Active Search using Detection and Location Uncertainty9 Mar 2022
- 2022Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perception16 Feb 2022
- 2021Gaussian Bounding Boxes and Probabilistic Intersection-over-Union for Object Detection10 Jun 2021
- 2021Uncertainty for Identifying Open-Set Errors in Visual Object Detection3 Apr 2021
- 2021A Review of Testing Object-Based Environment Perception for Safe Automated Driving16 Feb 2021
- 2021Semantics for Robotic Mapping, Perception and Interaction: A Survey2 Jan 2021