mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and Trends

arXiv 2206.05961 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2022cs.SEcited by 36

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated Driving Systems (ADS) have made great achievements in recent years thanks to the efforts from both academia and industry. A typical ADS is composed of multiple modules, including sensing, perception, planning, and control, which brings together the latest advances in different domains. Despite these achievements, safety assurance of ADS is of great significance, since unsafe behavior of ADS can bring catastrophic consequences. Testing has been recognized as an important system validation approach that aims to expose unsafe system behavior; however, in the context of ADS, it is extremely challenging to devise effective testing techniques, due to the high complexity and multidisciplinarity of the systems. There has been great much literature that focuses on the testing of ADS, and a number of surveys have also emerged to summarize the technical advances. Most of the surveys focus on the system-level testing performed within software simulators, and they thereby ignore the distinct features of different modules. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey on the existing ADS testing literature, which takes into account both module-level and system-level testing. Specifically, we make the following contributions: (1) we survey the module-level testing techniques for ADS and highlight the technical differences affected by the features of different modules; (2) we also survey the system-level testing techniques, with focuses on the empirical studies that summarize the issues occurring in system development or deployment, the problems due to the collaborations between different modules, and the gap between ADS testing in simulators and the real world; (3) we identify the challenges and opportunities in ADS testing, which pave the path to the future research in this field.

Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 9; 2025: 12; 2026: 10.

36 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Efficient Domain Augmentation for Autonomous Driving Testing Using Diffusion Modelscited by 10
  2. 2023Two is Better Than One: Digital Siblings to Improve Autonomous Driving Testingcited by 9
  3. 2023Domain Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Model: An Empirical Study in the Autonomous Driving Domaincited by 8
  4. 2023A Scenario-Based Functional Testing Approach to Improving DNN Performancecited by 7
  5. 2023Boundary State Generation for Testing and Improvement of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 6
  6. 2024Bridging the Gap between Real-world and Synthetic Images for Testing Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 4
  7. 2024Benchmarking Generative AI Models for Deep Learning Test Input Generationcited by 4
  8. 2025Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systemscited by 4
  9. 2025Generative AI for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: A Surveycited by 3
  10. 2024Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: a Replication and Extension Studycited by 2
  11. 2024Generative transformations and patterns in LLM-native approaches for software verification and falsificationcited by 2
  12. 2024Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzingcited by 2
24 more
  1. 2024LitSim: A Conflict-aware Policy for Long-term Interactive Traffic Simulationcited by 1
  2. 2024Preparing for Black Swans: The Antifragility Imperative for Machine Learningcited by 1
  3. 2024Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systemscited by 1
  4. 2025Evaluating Scenario-based Decision-making for Interactive Autonomous Driving Using Rational Criteria: A Surveycited by 1
  5. 2025Simulator Ensembles for Trustworthy Autonomous Driving Systems Testingcited by 1
  6. 2025ME3-BEV: Mamba-Enhanced Deep Reinforcement Learning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with BEV-Perceptioncited by 1
  7. 2025A Multi-Modality Evaluation of the Reality Gap in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 1
  8. 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 1
  9. 2025Quantifying Fidelity: A Decisive Feature Approach to Comparing Synthetic and Real Imagerycited by 1
  10. 2026DMAVA: Distributed Multi-Autonomous Vehicle Architecture Using Autowarecited by 1
  11. 2023Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Drivingcited by 0
  12. 2025MultiDrive: A Co-Simulation Framework Bridging 2D and 3D Driving Simulation for AV Software Validationcited by 0
  13. 2025Search-Based Software Engineering and AI Foundation Models: Current Landscape and Future Roadmapcited by 0
  14. 2025TigAug: Data Augmentation for Testing Traffic Light Detection in Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 0
  15. 2025Improving AEBS Validation Through Objective Intervention Classification Leveraging the Prediction Divergence Principlecited by 0
  16. 2026Validating Generalist Robots with Situation Calculus and STL Falsificationcited by 0
  17. 2026ROMAN: Reward-Orchestrated Multi-Head Attention Network for Autonomous Driving System Testingcited by 0
  18. 2026Declarative Scenario-based Testing with RoadLogiccited by 0
  19. 2026Emergency Lane-Change Simulation: A Behavioral Guidance Approach for Risky Scenario Generationcited by 0
  20. 2026AI Sandboxes: A Threat Model, Taxonomy, and Measurement Frameworkcited by 0
  21. 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 0
  22. 2026WM-Cov: Test Adequacy for Interactive World-Model-Style Autonomous Driving Simulationcited by 0
  23. 2026Beyond the Proving Ground: Independent Public-Road Testing of Assisted Lane Change Systems using LiDARcited by 0
  24. 2026A Survey on End-to-End Autonomous Driving Training from the Perspectives of Data, Strategy, and Platformcited by 0