mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SURE-Val: Safe Urban Relevance Extension and Validation

arXiv 2308.02266 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To evaluate perception components of an automated driving system, it is necessary to define the relevant objects. While the urban domain is popular among perception datasets, relevance is insufficiently specified for this domain. Therefore, this work adopts an existing method to define relevance in the highway domain and expands it to the urban domain. While different conceptualizations and definitions of relevance are present in literature, there is a lack of methods to validate these definitions. Therefore, this work presents a novel relevance validation method leveraging a motion prediction component. The validation leverages the idea that removing irrelevant objects should not influence a prediction component which reflects human driving behavior. The influence on the prediction is quantified by considering the statistical distribution of prediction performance across a large-scale dataset. The validation procedure is verified using criteria specifically designed to exclude relevant objects. The validation method is successfully applied to the relevance criteria from this work, thus supporting their validity.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2023.

Builds on

23 of 46 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  2. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
  3. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  4. 2020Lift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images From Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3Dcited by 1,044
  5. 2023Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecastingcited by 707
  6. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
  7. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 493
  8. 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 397
  9. 2020One Thousand and One Hours: Self-driving Motion Prediction Datasetcited by 240
  10. 2021One Million Scenes for Autonomous Driving: ONCE Datasetcited by 218
  11. 2020Perceive, Predict, and Plan: Safe Motion Planning Through Interpretable Semantic Representationscited by 153
  12. 2021Offboard 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud Sequencescited by 145
11 more
  1. 20223D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 132
  2. 2021Multimodal Trajectory Prediction Conditioned on Lane-Graph Traversalscited by 113
  3. 2020Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metricscited by 49
  4. 2021Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safetycited by 35
  5. 2020Safety Concerns and Mitigation Approaches Regarding the Use of Deep Learning in Safety-Critical Perception Taskscited by 31
  6. 2022Deep Interactive Motion Prediction and Planning: Playing Games with Motion Prediction Modelscited by 27
  7. 2021Revisiting 3D Object Detection From an Egocentric Perspectivecited by 18
  8. 2021A Review of Testing Object-Based Environment Perception for Safe Automated Drivingcited by 9
  9. 2018Zero-shot Deep Reinforcement Learning Driving Policy Transfer for Autonomous Vehicles based on Robust Controlcited by 7
  10. 2022Interaction-Dynamics-Aware Perception Zones for Obstacle Detection Safety Evaluationcited by 5
  11. 2022Watch Out for the Safety-Threatening Actors: Proactively Mitigating Safety Hazardscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.