mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LaplaceConfidence: a Graph-based Approach for Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2307.16614 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In real-world applications, perfect labels are rarely available, making it challenging to develop robust machine learning algorithms that can handle noisy labels. Recent methods have focused on filtering noise based on the discrepancy between model predictions and given noisy labels, assuming that samples with small classification losses are clean. This work takes a different approach by leveraging the consistency between the learned model and the entire noisy dataset using the rich representational and topological information in the data. We introduce LaplaceConfidence, a method that to obtain label confidence (i.e., clean probabilities) utilizing the Laplacian energy. Specifically, it first constructs graphs based on the feature representations of all noisy samples and minimizes the Laplacian energy to produce a low-energy graph. Clean labels should fit well into the low-energy graph while noisy ones should not, allowing our method to determine data's clean probabilities. Furthermore, LaplaceConfidence is embedded into a holistic method for robust training, where co-training technique generates unbiased label confidence and label refurbishment technique better utilizes it. We also explore the dimensionality reduction technique to accommodate our method on large-scale noisy datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that LaplaceConfidence outperforms state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets under both synthetic and real-world noise.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2023.

Builds on

46 of 62 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  7. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  8. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  9. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  10. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  11. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  12. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
34 more
  1. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  2. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  3. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  4. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  5. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  6. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  7. 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 351
  8. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  9. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  10. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  11. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  12. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  13. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  14. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  15. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  16. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  17. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  18. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
  19. 2018A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: a Big Data -- AI Integration Perspectivecited by 111
  20. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  21. 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
  22. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  23. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  24. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  25. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  26. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  27. 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
  28. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  29. 2020Deep k-NN for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  30. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  31. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  32. 2022Few-shot Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 23
  33. 2021Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right: Combating Confirmation Bias in Learning with Label Noisecited by 18
  34. 2021Learning From Long-Tailed Data With Noisy Labelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.