mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Subgraph Stationary Hardware-Software Inference Co-Design

arXiv 2306.17266 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2023cs.DC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A growing number of applications depend on Machine Learning (ML) functionality and benefits from both higher quality ML predictions and better timeliness (latency) at the same time. A growing body of research in computer architecture, ML, and systems software literature focuses on reaching better latency-accuracy tradeoffs for ML models. Efforts include compression, quantization, pruning, early-exit models, mixed DNN precision, as well as ML inference accelerator designs that minimize latency and energy, while preserving delivered accuracy. All of them, however, yield improvements for a single static point in the latency-accuracy tradeoff space. We make a case for applications that operate in dynamically changing deployment scenarios, where no single static point is optimal. We draw on a recently proposed weight-shared SuperNet mechanism to enable serving a stream of queries that uses (activates) different SubNets within this weight-shared construct. This creates an opportunity to exploit the inherent temporal locality with our proposed SubGraph Stationary (SGS) optimization. We take a hardware-software co-design approach with a real implementation of SGS in SushiAccel and the implementation of a software scheduler SushiSched controlling which SubNets to serve and what to cache in real-time. Combined, they are vertically integrated into SUSHI-an inference serving stack. For the stream of queries, SUSHI yields up to 25% improvement in latency, 0.98% increase in served accuracy. SUSHI can achieve up to 78.7% off-chip energy savings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

Builds on

28 of 48 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  2. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  3. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 787
  4. 2018ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and Hardwarecited by 673
  5. 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 618
  6. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
  7. 2018LQ-Nets: Learned Quantization for Highly Accurate and Compact Deep Neural Networkscited by 274
  8. 2019SMART: Robust and Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-trained Natural Language Models through Principled Regularized Optimizationcited by 254
  9. 2018Convolutional Social Pooling for Vehicle Trajectory Predictioncited by 221
  10. 2019MLPerf Inference Benchmarkcited by 199
  11. 2016Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving Systemcited by 191
  12. 2020BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Single-Stage Modelscited by 188
16 more
  1. 2018ProxQuant: Quantized Neural Networks via Proximal Operatorscited by 59
  2. 2019Benchmarking TPU, GPU, and CPU Platforms for Deep Learningcited by 52
  3. 2018Focus: Querying Large Video Datasets with Low Latency and Low Costcited by 46
  4. 2020HOLMES: Health OnLine Model Ensemble Serving for Deep Learning Models in Intensive Care Unitscited by 45
  5. 2021FLAT: An Optimized Dataflow for Mitigating Attention Bottleneckscited by 39
  6. 2019Deep Learning for Large-Scale Traffic-Sign Detection and Recognitioncited by 34
  7. 2018YOLO3D: End-to-end real-time 3D Oriented Object Bounding Box Detection from LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 32
  8. 2021CompOFA: Compound Once-For-All Networks for Faster Multi-Platform Deploymentcited by 26
  9. 2022AI and ML Accelerator Survey and Trendscited by 23
  10. 2020Least squares binary quantization of neural networkscited by 21
  11. 2021Latency-Aware Neural Architecture Search with Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 15
  12. 2021FORMS: Fine-grained Polarized ReRAM-based In-situ Computation for Mixed-signal DNN Acceleratorcited by 12
  13. 2019One Size Does Not Fit All: Quantifying and Exposing the Accuracy-Latency Trade-off in Machine Learning Cloud Service APIs via Tolerance Tierscited by 7
  14. 2021Rethinking Floating Point Overheads for Mixed Precision DNN Acceleratorscited by 4
  15. 2020Improving Memory Utilization in Convolutional Neural Network Acceleratorscited by 2
  16. 2022Communication Bounds for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Model-Architecture Co-Design for High Performance Temporal GNN Inference on FPGA
  2. 2022FullPack: Full Vector Utilization for Sub-Byte Quantized Inference on General Purpose CPUs
  3. 2021HAO: Hardware-aware neural Architecture Optimization for Efficient Inference
  4. 2026Energy Efficient Software Hardware CoDesign for Machine Learning: From TinyML to Large Language Models
  5. 2026ALADIN: Accuracy-Latency-Aware Design-space Inference Analysis for Embedded AI Accelerators
  6. 2024Search for Efficient Large Language Models
  7. 2025AMPLE: Event-Driven Accelerator for Mixed-Precision Inference of Graph Neural Networks
  8. 2026Pipeline-Native Transformers: Co-Designing Model Architecture and CPU Inference for Bandwidth-Efficient Autoregressive Decode