mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pipeline-Native Transformers: Co-Designing Model Architecture and CPU Inference for Bandwidth-Efficient Autoregressive Decode

arXiv 2608.23841 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.AR cs.LG cs.PFcited by 0

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Efficient MoE training and inference systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Single-token autoregressive decode on CPUs is bound by memory bandwidth, not arithmetic: a modern CPU sustains roughly 1 TFLOP/s of compute but only about 50 GB/s from main memory, and each generated token must stream every active weight once. This report argues that the most effective response is to co-design the model architecture and the inference runtime together. It presents cflow, a CPU-first streaming engine, alongside a family of pipeline-native transformer architectures whose inter-layer dependency graphs are constructed to permit a vertical, stage-major execution schedule. cflow stores weights as L2-sized tiles in compute-consumption order, reads only the top-k experts of each mixture-of-experts layer, fuses projections, and executes a delay-aware schedule from per-model dependency parameters. Across five architectures trained on TinyStories, one (arch2_4_combined) achieves a 2.00x reduction in critical-path weight bandwidth (9.00 to 4.50 MB/token) within 0.24 perplexity of the best candidate, and the tile layout incurs 7.29x fewer L1-data read misses than a row-major baseline. On a 30.9-billion-parameter pipeline-native MoE, cflow decodes at 5.94 tokens/s (tok/s) on a 32-vCPU Ice Lake server, ahead of llama.cpp (4.75) and the vLLM CPU backend (1.65) on comparably sized dense models. Realizing the expert-delay window as asynchronous I/O overlap on a disk-resident expert tier yields a further net win of up to 1.68x, matching the overlap model within 1%. Measurement refutes one of the eight design claims and leaves a second inconclusive; both are reported in full, with the conditions under which they would hold.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Efficient MoE training and inference systems, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 0 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

0 of 30 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding
  2. 2026Lossless but Not Free: An Empirical Anatomy of Speculative Decoding on Consumer Hardware
  3. 2026The Illusion of Equivalence: Systematic FP16 Divergence in KV-Cached Autoregressive Inference
  4. 2026Memory-Bound but Not Bandwidth-Limited: The Physical AI Inference Gap in Batch-1 LLM Decode
  5. 2026FairyFuse: Multiplication-Free LLM Inference on CPUs via Fused Ternary Kernels
  6. 2025SpecPipe: Accelerating Pipeline Parallelism-based LLM Inference with Speculative Decoding
  7. 2026Decode-Branch Transformers: Decoupling the Primary Prefill Path from Additional Decode Computation
  8. 2026Budgeting Bytes: A Windowed Storage Roofline and Dual-Budget Architecture Ablations for Storage-Bound LLM Decoding