mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robustness of SAM: Segment Anything Under Corruptions and Beyond

arXiv 2306.07713 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 31

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Segment anything model (SAM), as the name suggests, is claimed to be capable of cutting out any object and demonstrates impressive zero-shot transfer performance with the guidance of prompts. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive evaluation regarding its robustness under various corruptions. Understanding the robustness of SAM across different corruption scenarios is crucial for its real-world deployment. Prior works show that SAM is biased towards texture (style) rather than shape, motivated by which we start by investigating its robustness against style transfer, which is synthetic corruption. Following by interpreting the effects of synthetic corruption as style changes, we proceed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation for its robustness against 15 types of common corruption. These corruptions mainly fall into categories such as digital, noise, weather, and blur, and within each corruption category, we explore 5 severity levels to simulate real-world corruption scenarios. Beyond the corruptions, we further assess the robustness of SAM against local occlusion and local adversarial patch attacks. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first of its kind to evaluate the robustness of SAM under style change, local occlusion, and local adversarial patch attacks. Given that patch attacks visible to human eyes are easily detectable, we further assess its robustness against global adversarial attacks that are imperceptible to human eyes. Overall, this work provides a comprehensive empirical study of the robustness of SAM, evaluating its performance under various corruptions and extending the assessment to critical aspects such as local occlusion, local adversarial patch attacks, and global adversarial attacks. These evaluations yield valuable insights into the practical applicability and effectiveness of SAM in addressing real-world challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 81 of its 119 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

Builds on

81 of 119 references.

References · 81

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  6. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  7. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  8. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  9. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  10. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  11. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  12. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
38 more
  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  5. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  6. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  8. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  9. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  10. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
  11. 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 2,010
  12. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  13. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  14. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  15. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  16. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  17. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 804
  18. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
  19. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  20. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 373
  21. 2023Text-to-image Diffusion Models in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 265
  22. 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 249
  23. 2022TinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformerscited by 234
  24. 2023Track Anything: Segment Anything Meets Videoscited by 234
  25. 2023Inpaint Anything: Segment Anything Meets Image Inpaintingcited by 233
  26. 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 197
  27. 2023Segment and Track Anythingcited by 193
  28. 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
  29. 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 119
  30. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
  31. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  32. 2021Deep Occlusion-Aware Instance Segmentation with Overlapping BiLayerscited by 104
  33. 2023Can SAM Segment Anything? When SAM Meets Camouflaged Object Detectioncited by 100
  34. 2023Anything-3D: Towards Single-view Anything Reconstruction in the Wildcited by 92
  35. 2020On Success and Simplicity: A Second Look at Transferable Targeted Attackscited by 89
  36. 2023A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need?cited by 84
  37. 2022Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Point Cloud Recognition Against Common Corruptionscited by 80
  38. 2023A Survey on Audio Diffusion Models: Text To Speech Synthesis and Enhancement in Generative AIcited by 68

50 most cited of 81 All 81 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 10; 2024: 12; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

31 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023MobileSAMv2: Faster Segment Anything to Everythingcited by 42
  2. 2024RobustSAM: Segment Anything Robustly on Degraded Imagescited by 36
  3. 2023Robustness of Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Autonomous Driving in Adverse Weather Conditionscited by 14
  4. 2023Black-box Targeted Adversarial Attack on Segment Anything (SAM)cited by 13
  5. 2023SamDSK: Combining Segment Anything Model with Domain-Specific Knowledge for Semi-Supervised Learning in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 12
  6. 2024Practical Region-level Attack against Segment Anything Modelscited by 9
  7. 2024Robust Box Prompt based SAM for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
  8. 2023Internal-External Boundary Attention Fusion for Glass Surface Segmentationcited by 6
  9. 2023On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 6
  10. 2024Benchmarking PathCLIP for Pathology Image Analysiscited by 6
  11. 2024Unsegment Anything by Simulating Deformationcited by 6
  12. 2023Segment (Almost) Nothing: Prompt-Agnostic Adversarial Attacks on Segmentation Modelscited by 5
19 more
  1. 2024Segment-Anything Models Achieve Zero-shot Robustness in Autonomous Drivingcited by 5
  2. 2023Boosting Federated Learning Convergence with Prototype Regularizationcited by 4
  3. 2023SAM Meets UAP: Attacking Segment Anything Model With Universal Adversarial Perturbationcited by 4
  4. 2024Red-Teaming Segment Anything Modelcited by 4
  5. 2024Logit Calibration and Feature Contrast for Robust Federated Learning on Non-IID Datacited by 4
  6. 2024Learning from Unlabelled Data with Transformers: Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of High Resolution Aerial Imagescited by 4
  7. 2025Robust SAM: On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Foundation Modelscited by 4
  8. 2024Towards Dependable Optical Flow: Benchmarks for Real-World Spatiotemporal Corruptionscited by 3
  9. 2024Curriculum Fine-tuning of Vision Foundation Model for Medical Image Classification Under Label Noisecited by 3
  10. 2025Segment Any-Quality Images with Generative Latent Space Enhancementcited by 3
  11. 2024TETRIS: Towards Exploring the Robustness of Interactive Segmentationcited by 2
  12. 2025RoSe: Robust Self-supervised Stereo Matching under Adverse Weather Conditionscited by 2
  13. 2023BoxCell: Leveraging SAM for Cell Segmentation with Box Supervisioncited by 1
  14. 2025Towards Communication-Efficient Adversarial Federated Learning for Robust Edge Intelligencecited by 1
  15. 2026Towards Any-Quality Image Segmentation via Generative and Adaptive Latent Space Enhancementcited by 0
  16. 2026DeCoDrift: Stabilizing Decoder Coupling in Closed-Loop Foundation Segmentationcited by 0
  17. 2026PGE-SAM: Prompt-Guided Feature Enhancement for Interactive Segmentation under Degradationcited by 0
  18. 2026Universal Concept Disruption for SAM3 Image Segmentationcited by 0
  19. 2026Universal Cross-Prompt Adversarial Attacks on Promptable Concept Segmentationcited by 0